TSTP Solution File: SYO264^5 by Leo-III-SAT---1.7.15

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III-SAT---1.7.15
% Problem  : SYO264^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d SAT

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 20:54:50 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 29.76s 5.44s
% Output   : Refutation 29.76s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   28
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   44 (  12 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  170 (  26 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  463 ( 116   ~;  74   |;   9   &; 264   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   56 (  56   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  107 (  39   ^  62   !;   6   ?; 107   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(sk1_type,type,
    sk1: $i ).

thf(sk2_type,type,
    sk2: $i ).

thf(sk4_type,type,
    sk4: $i > $o ).

thf(sk5_type,type,
    sk5: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(sk6_type,type,
    sk6: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i > $o] :
    ? [E: $i > $o,F: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( E @ A )
        | ( F @ A ) )
      & ( ( D @ B )
        | ( F @ B ) )
      & ( ( E @ C )
        | ~ ( D @ C ) )
      & ! [G: $i] :
          ( ( F @ G )
          = ( ~ ( D @ G ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM125C) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i > $o] :
      ? [E: $i > $o,F: $i > $o] :
        ( ( ( E @ A )
          | ( F @ A ) )
        & ( ( D @ B )
          | ( F @ B ) )
        & ( ( E @ C )
          | ~ ( D @ C ) )
        & ! [G: $i] :
            ( ( F @ G )
            = ( ~ ( D @ G ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i > $o] :
      ? [E: $i > $o,F: $i > $o] :
        ( ( ( E @ A )
          | ( F @ A ) )
        & ( ( D @ B )
          | ( F @ B ) )
        & ( ( E @ C )
          | ~ ( D @ C ) )
        & ! [G: $i] :
            ( ( F @ G )
            = ( ~ ( D @ G ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ! [B: $i > $o,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( sk5 @ B @ A )
      | ~ ( B @ sk2 )
      | ~ ( A @ sk3 )
      | ( ( B @ ( sk6 @ B @ A ) )
       != ( ~ ( sk4 @ ( sk6 @ B @ A ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ! [B: $i > $o,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( sk6 @ B @ A ) )
       != ( ~ ( sk4 @ ( sk6 @ B @ A ) ) ) )
      | ( sk5 @ B @ A )
      | ~ ( B @ sk2 )
      | ~ ( A @ sk3 ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ! [B: $i > $o,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( B @ sk1 )
      | ~ ( sk5 @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ! [B: $i > $o,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ~ ( B @ sk1 )
      | ~ ( sk5
          @ ^ [C: $i] :
              ~ ( B @ C )
          @ A ) ),
    inference(prim_subst,[status(thm)],[5:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( ^ [D: $i] : ~ ( C @ D ) ))]]) ).

thf(30,plain,
    ! [B: $i > $o,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( sk5
          @ ^ [C: $i] :
              ~ ( B @ C )
          @ A )
      | ( B @ sk1 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[15]) ).

thf(31,plain,
    ! [B: $i > $o,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( sk5
          @ ^ [C: $i] :
              ~ ( B @ C )
          @ A )
      | ( B @ sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[30]) ).

thf(66,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( sk5
          @ ^ [B: $i] :
              ~ ( sk4 @ B )
          @ A )
      | ( sk4 @ sk1 ) ),
    inference(prim_subst,[status(thm)],[31:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( sk4 ))]]) ).

thf(155,plain,
    ! [C: $i > $o,B: $i > $o,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( sk6 @ B @ A ) )
       != ( ~ ( sk4 @ ( sk6 @ B @ A ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( B @ sk2 )
      | ~ ( A @ sk3 )
      | ( sk4 @ sk1 )
      | ( ( sk5 @ B @ A )
       != ( sk5
          @ ^ [D: $i] :
              ~ ( sk4 @ D )
          @ C ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[10,66]) ).

thf(156,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( sk4
              @ ( sk6
                @ ^ [B: $i] :
                    ~ ( sk4 @ B )
                @ A ) ) )
       != ( ~ ( sk4
              @ ( sk6
                @ ^ [B: $i] :
                    ~ ( sk4 @ B )
                @ A ) ) ) )
      | ~ ~ ( sk4 @ sk2 )
      | ~ ( A @ sk3 )
      | ( sk4 @ sk1 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[155:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( ^ [D: $i] : ~ ( sk4 @ D ) )),bind(C,$thf( A ))]]) ).

thf(219,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( sk4 @ sk1 )
      | ~ ( A @ sk3 )
      | ( sk4 @ sk2 )
      | ( ( ~ ( sk4
              @ ( sk6
                @ ^ [B: $i] :
                    ~ ( sk4 @ B )
                @ A ) ) )
       != ( ~ ( sk4
              @ ( sk6
                @ ^ [B: $i] :
                    ~ ( sk4 @ B )
                @ A ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[156]) ).

thf(220,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( sk4 @ sk1 )
      | ~ ( A @ sk3 )
      | ( sk4 @ sk2 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[219]) ).

thf(292,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( sk4 @ sk1 )
      | ( sk4 @ sk2 )
      | ( ( A @ sk3 )
       != ( ~ ( sk4 @ sk1 ) ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(eqfactor_ordered,[status(thm)],[220]) ).

thf(302,plain,
    ( ( sk4 @ sk1 )
    | ( sk4 @ sk2 ) ),
    inference(pre_uni,[status(thm)],[292:[bind(A,$thf( ^ [B: $i] : ~ ( sk4 @ sk1 ) ))]]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ! [B: $i > $o,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( sk5 @ B @ A )
      | ~ ( sk4 @ sk2 )
      | ~ ( A @ sk3 )
      | ( ( B @ ( sk6 @ B @ A ) )
       != ( ~ ( sk4 @ ( sk6 @ B @ A ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ! [B: $i > $o,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( sk6 @ B @ A ) )
       != ( ~ ( sk4 @ ( sk6 @ B @ A ) ) ) )
      | ( sk5 @ B @ A )
      | ~ ( sk4 @ sk2 )
      | ~ ( A @ sk3 ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(786,plain,
    ! [C: $i > $o,B: $i > $o,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( sk6 @ B @ A ) )
       != ( ~ ( sk4 @ ( sk6 @ B @ A ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( sk4 @ sk2 )
      | ~ ( A @ sk3 )
      | ( sk4 @ sk1 )
      | ( ( sk5 @ B @ A )
       != ( sk5
          @ ^ [D: $i] :
              ~ ( sk4 @ D )
          @ C ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[13,66]) ).

thf(787,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( sk4
              @ ( sk6
                @ ^ [B: $i] :
                    ~ ( sk4 @ B )
                @ A ) ) )
       != ( ~ ( sk4
              @ ( sk6
                @ ^ [B: $i] :
                    ~ ( sk4 @ B )
                @ A ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( sk4 @ sk2 )
      | ~ ( A @ sk3 )
      | ( sk4 @ sk1 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[786:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( ^ [D: $i] : ~ ( sk4 @ D ) )),bind(C,$thf( A ))]]) ).

thf(866,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( sk4 @ sk2 )
      | ~ ( A @ sk3 )
      | ( sk4 @ sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[787]) ).

thf(1144,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( sk4 @ sk1 )
      | ~ ( A @ sk3 )
      | ( ( sk4 @ sk2 )
       != ( sk4 @ sk2 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[302,866]) ).

thf(1145,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( sk4 @ sk1 )
      | ~ ( A @ sk3 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[1144:[]]) ).

thf(1243,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( sk4 @ sk1 )
      | ( ( A @ sk3 )
       != ( ~ ( sk4 @ sk1 ) ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(eqfactor_ordered,[status(thm)],[1145]) ).

thf(1268,plain,
    sk4 @ sk1,
    inference(pre_uni,[status(thm)],[1243:[bind(A,$thf( ^ [B: $i] : ~ ( sk4 @ sk1 ) ))]]) ).

thf(1366,plain,
    ! [B: $i > $o,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( sk6 @ B @ A ) )
       != ( ~ ( sk4 @ ( sk6 @ B @ A ) ) ) )
      | ( sk5 @ B @ A )
      | ~ ( sk4 @ sk2 )
      | ( ( sk4 @ sk1 )
       != ( A @ sk3 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[1268,13]) ).

thf(1390,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( A
          @ ( sk6 @ A
            @ ^ [B: $i] : ( sk4 @ sk1 ) ) )
       != ( ~ ( sk4
              @ ( sk6 @ A
                @ ^ [B: $i] : ( sk4 @ sk1 ) ) ) ) )
      | ( sk5 @ A
        @ ^ [B: $i] : ( sk4 @ sk1 ) )
      | ~ ( sk4 @ sk2 ) ),
    inference(pre_uni,[status(thm)],[1366:[bind(A,$thf( ^ [C: $i] : ( sk4 @ sk1 ) )),bind(B,$thf( B ))]]) ).

thf(1391,plain,
    ( ~ ( sk4 @ sk2 )
    | ( sk5
      @ ^ [A: $i] :
          ~ ( sk4 @ A )
      @ ^ [A: $i] : ( sk4 @ sk1 ) ) ),
    inference(pre_uni,[status(thm)],[1390:[bind(A,$thf( ^ [B: $i] : ~ ( sk4 @ B ) ))]]) ).

thf(1362,plain,
    ! [B: $i > $o,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( sk6 @ B @ A ) )
       != ( ~ ( sk4 @ ( sk6 @ B @ A ) ) ) )
      | ( sk5 @ B @ A )
      | ~ ( B @ sk2 )
      | ( ( sk4 @ sk1 )
       != ( A @ sk3 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[1268,10]) ).

thf(1377,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( A
          @ ( sk6 @ A
            @ ^ [B: $i] : ( sk4 @ sk1 ) ) )
       != ( ~ ( sk4
              @ ( sk6 @ A
                @ ^ [B: $i] : ( sk4 @ sk1 ) ) ) ) )
      | ( sk5 @ A
        @ ^ [B: $i] : ( sk4 @ sk1 ) )
      | ~ ( A @ sk2 ) ),
    inference(pre_uni,[status(thm)],[1362:[bind(A,$thf( ^ [C: $i] : ( sk4 @ sk1 ) )),bind(B,$thf( B ))]]) ).

thf(1378,plain,
    ( ~ ~ ( sk4 @ sk2 )
    | ( sk5
      @ ^ [A: $i] :
          ~ ( sk4 @ A )
      @ ^ [A: $i] : ( sk4 @ sk1 ) ) ),
    inference(pre_uni,[status(thm)],[1377:[bind(A,$thf( ^ [B: $i] : ~ ( sk4 @ B ) ))]]) ).

thf(1400,plain,
    ( ( sk5
      @ ^ [A: $i] :
          ~ ( sk4 @ A )
      @ ^ [A: $i] : ( sk4 @ sk1 ) )
    | ( sk4 @ sk2 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[1378]) ).

thf(1649,plain,
    ( ( sk5
      @ ^ [A: $i] :
          ~ ( sk4 @ A )
      @ ^ [A: $i] : $true )
    | ( sk4 @ sk2 ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[1400,1268]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ! [B: $i > $o,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( A @ sk1 )
      | ~ ( sk5 @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).

thf(1371,plain,
    ! [B: $i > $o,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( sk5 @ B @ A )
      | ( ( sk4 @ sk1 )
       != ( A @ sk1 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[1268,7]) ).

thf(1395,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ~ ( sk5 @ A
        @ ^ [B: $i] : ( sk4 @ sk1 ) ),
    inference(pre_uni,[status(thm)],[1371:[bind(A,$thf( ^ [C: $i] : ( sk4 @ sk1 ) )),bind(B,$thf( B ))]]) ).

thf(1401,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ~ ( sk5 @ A
        @ ^ [B: $i] : ( sk4 @ sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[1395]) ).

thf(1531,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ~ ( sk5 @ A
        @ ^ [B: $i] : $true ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[1401,1268]) ).

thf(1668,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( sk4 @ sk2 )
      | ( ( sk5
          @ ^ [B: $i] :
              ~ ( sk4 @ B )
          @ ^ [B: $i] : $true )
       != ( sk5 @ A
          @ ^ [B: $i] : $true ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[1649,1531]) ).

thf(1669,plain,
    sk4 @ sk2,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[1668:[bind(A,$thf( ^ [B: $i] : ~ ( sk4 @ B ) ))]]) ).

thf(2559,plain,
    ( ~ $true
    | ( sk5
      @ ^ [A: $i] :
          ~ ( sk4 @ A )
      @ ^ [A: $i] : $true ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[1391,1268,1669]) ).

thf(2560,plain,
    ( sk5
    @ ^ [A: $i] :
        ~ ( sk4 @ A )
    @ ^ [A: $i] : $true ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[2559]) ).

thf(2570,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( sk5
        @ ^ [B: $i] :
            ~ ( sk4 @ B )
        @ ^ [B: $i] : $true )
     != ( sk5 @ A
        @ ^ [B: $i] : $true ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[2560,1531]) ).

thf(2571,plain,
    $false,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[2570:[bind(A,$thf( ^ [B: $i] : ~ ( sk4 @ B ) ))]]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : SYO264^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d SAT
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Jun 23 08:40:10 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.96/0.90  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.23/1.00  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (102ms). 
% 1.23/1.01  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.64/1.22  % [INFO] 	 nitpick registered as external prover. 
% 1.64/1.23  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.86/1.28  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.86/1.31  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.86/1.31  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 1.86/1.31  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.86/1.31  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 29.76/5.43  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 29.76/5.43  % Time passed: 4886ms (effective reasoning time: 4421ms)
% 29.76/5.43  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 29.76/5.44  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 29.76/5.44  % No. of inferences in proof: 44
% 29.76/5.44  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 4886 ms resp. 4421 ms w/o parsing
% 29.76/5.50  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 29.76/5.50  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------