TSTP Solution File: SYO260^5 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SYO260^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 09:03:41 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 0.37s
% Output : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYO260^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.34 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Mon May 20 09:34:07 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.35 This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.15/0.35 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.37 % (2368)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.15/0.37 % (2368)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.37 % (2368)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.37 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.37 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.37 thf(func_def_4, type, sK1: $i > $o).
% 0.15/0.37 thf(func_def_9, type, ph5: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 0.15/0.37 thf(f97,plain,(
% 0.15/0.37 $false),
% 0.15/0.37 inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f25,f62,f92])).
% 0.15/0.37 thf(f92,plain,(
% 0.15/0.37 ~spl4_1),
% 0.15/0.37 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f91])).
% 0.15/0.37 thf(f91,plain,(
% 0.15/0.37 $false | ~spl4_1),
% 0.15/0.37 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f90])).
% 0.15/0.37 thf(f90,plain,(
% 0.15/0.37 ($true != $true) | ~spl4_1),
% 0.15/0.37 inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f89])).
% 0.15/0.37 thf(f89,plain,(
% 0.15/0.37 ($true != $true) | ($true != $true) | ~spl4_1),
% 0.15/0.37 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f76])).
% 0.15/0.37 thf(f76,plain,(
% 0.15/0.37 ($true != ((^[Y0 : $i]: ($true)) @ sK2)) | ($true != ((^[Y0 : $i]: ($true)) @ sK3)) | ~spl4_1),
% 0.15/0.37 inference(primitive_instantiation,[],[f21])).
% 0.15/0.37 thf(f21,plain,(
% 0.15/0.37 ( ! [X4 : $i > $o] : (($true != (X4 @ sK3)) | ($true != (X4 @ sK2))) ) | ~spl4_1),
% 0.15/0.37 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f20])).
% 0.15/0.37 thf(f20,plain,(
% 0.15/0.37 spl4_1 <=> ! [X4 : $i > $o] : (($true != (X4 @ sK2)) | ($true != (X4 @ sK3)))),
% 0.15/0.37 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_1])])).
% 0.15/0.37 thf(f62,plain,(
% 0.15/0.37 ~spl4_2),
% 0.15/0.37 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f61])).
% 0.15/0.37 thf(f61,plain,(
% 0.15/0.37 $false | ~spl4_2),
% 0.15/0.37 inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f56,f24])).
% 0.15/0.37 thf(f24,plain,(
% 0.15/0.37 ( ! [X5 : $i > $o] : (($true != (X5 @ sK0))) ) | ~spl4_2),
% 0.15/0.37 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f23])).
% 0.15/0.37 thf(f23,plain,(
% 0.15/0.37 spl4_2 <=> ! [X5 : $i > $o] : ($true != (X5 @ sK0))),
% 0.15/0.37 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_2])])).
% 0.15/0.37 thf(f56,plain,(
% 0.15/0.37 ( ! [X8 : $i > $o] : (($true = (X8 @ sK0))) ) | ~spl4_2),
% 0.15/0.37 inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f55])).
% 0.15/0.37 thf(f55,plain,(
% 0.15/0.37 ( ! [X8 : $i > $o] : (($true != (~ (X8 @ sK0)))) ) | ~spl4_2),
% 0.15/0.37 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f52])).
% 0.15/0.37 thf(f52,plain,(
% 0.15/0.37 ( ! [X8 : $i > $o] : (($true != ((^[Y0 : $i]: (~ (X8 @ Y0))) @ sK0))) ) | ~spl4_2),
% 0.15/0.37 inference(primitive_instantiation,[],[f24])).
% 0.15/0.37 thf(f25,plain,(
% 0.15/0.37 spl4_1 | spl4_2),
% 0.15/0.37 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f13,f23,f20])).
% 0.15/0.37 thf(f13,plain,(
% 0.15/0.37 ( ! [X4 : $i > $o,X5 : $i > $o] : (($true != (X5 @ sK0)) | ($true != (X4 @ sK2)) | ($true != (X4 @ sK3))) )),
% 0.15/0.37 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10])).
% 0.15/0.37 thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.15/0.37 ! [X4 : $i > $o,X5 : $i > $o] : ((((sK1 @ sK0) != $true) & ($true != (X5 @ sK0))) | (($true != (X4 @ sK2)) & ($true = (sK1 @ sK2))) | (($true != (X5 @ sK3)) & ($true != (X4 @ sK3))))),
% 0.15/0.37 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f8,f9])).
% 0.15/0.37 thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.15/0.37 ? [X0,X1 : $i > $o,X2,X3] : ! [X4 : $i > $o,X5 : $i > $o] : ((($true != (X1 @ X0)) & ((X5 @ X0) != $true)) | (((X4 @ X2) != $true) & ($true = (X1 @ X2))) | (($true != (X5 @ X3)) & ($true != (X4 @ X3)))) => ! [X5 : $i > $o,X4 : $i > $o] : ((((sK1 @ sK0) != $true) & ($true != (X5 @ sK0))) | (($true != (X4 @ sK2)) & ($true = (sK1 @ sK2))) | (($true != (X5 @ sK3)) & ($true != (X4 @ sK3))))),
% 0.15/0.37 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.15/0.37 thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.15/0.37 ? [X0,X1 : $i > $o,X2,X3] : ! [X4 : $i > $o,X5 : $i > $o] : ((($true != (X1 @ X0)) & ((X5 @ X0) != $true)) | (((X4 @ X2) != $true) & ($true = (X1 @ X2))) | (($true != (X5 @ X3)) & ($true != (X4 @ X3))))),
% 0.15/0.37 inference(rectify,[],[f7])).
% 0.15/0.37 thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.15/0.37 ? [X0,X3 : $i > $o,X1,X2] : ! [X4 : $i > $o,X5 : $i > $o] : ((($true != (X3 @ X0)) & ((X5 @ X0) != $true)) | (($true != (X4 @ X1)) & ((X3 @ X1) = $true)) | (($true != (X5 @ X2)) & ((X4 @ X2) != $true)))),
% 0.15/0.37 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f6])).
% 0.15/0.37 thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.15/0.37 ~! [X0,X1,X2,X3 : $i > $o] : ? [X4 : $i > $o,X5 : $i > $o] : ((($true = (X4 @ X1)) | ((X3 @ X1) != $true)) & (($true = (X5 @ X2)) | ((X4 @ X2) = $true)) & (($true = (X3 @ X0)) | ((X5 @ X0) = $true)))),
% 0.15/0.37 inference(flattening,[],[f5])).
% 0.15/0.37 thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.15/0.37 ~! [X0,X1,X2,X3 : $i > $o] : ? [X4 : $i > $o,X5 : $i > $o] : ((($true = (X5 @ X2)) | ((X4 @ X2) = $true)) & (~((X3 @ X1) = $true) | ($true = (X4 @ X1))) & (($true = (X3 @ X0)) | ((X5 @ X0) = $true)))),
% 0.15/0.37 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4])).
% 0.15/0.37 thf(f4,plain,(
% 0.15/0.37 ~! [X0,X1,X2,X3 : $i > $o] : ? [X4 : $i > $o,X5 : $i > $o] : (((X5 @ X2) | (X4 @ X2)) & (~(X3 @ X1) | (X4 @ X1)) & ((X3 @ X0) | (X5 @ X0)))),
% 0.15/0.37 inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 0.15/0.37 thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.15/0.37 ~! [X1,X2,X0,X3 : $i > $o] : ? [X4 : $i > $o,X5 : $i > $o] : (((X5 @ X0) | (X4 @ X0)) & (~(X3 @ X2) | (X4 @ X2)) & ((X3 @ X1) | (X5 @ X1)))),
% 0.15/0.37 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.15/0.37 thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.15/0.37 ! [X1,X2,X0,X3 : $i > $o] : ? [X4 : $i > $o,X5 : $i > $o] : (((X5 @ X0) | (X4 @ X0)) & (~(X3 @ X2) | (X4 @ X2)) & ((X3 @ X1) | (X5 @ X1)))),
% 0.15/0.37 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM125A)).
% 0.15/0.37 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.37 % (2368)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37 % (2368)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.37 % (2368)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.37
% 0.15/0.37 % (2368)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.37 % (2368)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.37 % (2368)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.15/0.37 % (2368)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37 % (2368)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37 % (2361)Success in time 0.02 s
% 0.15/0.37 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------