TSTP Solution File: SYO253^5 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SYO253^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 09:03:40 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.08s 0.31s
% Output   : Refutation 0.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.08  % Problem    : SYO253^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.05/0.09  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.08/0.29  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.29  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.08/0.29  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.08/0.29  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 09:36:38 EDT 2024
% 0.08/0.29  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.08/0.29  This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.08/0.29  Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.31  % (12092)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.08/0.31  % (12093)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.08/0.31  % (12091)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.08/0.31  % (12090)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.08/0.31  % (12095)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.08/0.31  % (12092)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.08/0.31  % (12092)------------------------------
% 0.08/0.31  % (12092)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.08/0.31  % (12092)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.08/0.31  % (12092)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.08/0.31  % (12093)First to succeed.
% 0.08/0.31  
% 0.08/0.31  % (12092)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.08/0.31  % (12092)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.08/0.31  % (12092)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.08/0.31  % (12092)------------------------------
% 0.08/0.31  % (12092)------------------------------
% 0.08/0.31  % (12089)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.08/0.31  % (12090)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.08/0.31  % (12090)------------------------------
% 0.08/0.31  % (12090)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.08/0.31  % (12090)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.08/0.31  
% 0.08/0.31  
% 0.08/0.31  % (12090)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.08/0.31  % (12090)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.08/0.31  % (12090)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.08/0.31  % (12090)------------------------------
% 0.08/0.31  % (12090)------------------------------
% 0.08/0.31  % (12091)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.08/0.31  % (12093)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.08/0.31  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.08/0.31  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.08/0.31  thf(func_def_8, type, ph1: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 0.08/0.31  thf(f23,plain,(
% 0.08/0.31    $false),
% 0.08/0.31    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f12])).
% 0.08/0.31  thf(f12,plain,(
% 0.08/0.31    ($false = $true)),
% 0.08/0.31    inference(leibniz_equality_elimination,[],[f10])).
% 0.08/0.31  thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.08/0.31    ( ! [X0 : $o > $o] : (((X0 @ $true) = $true) | ($true != (X0 @ $false))) )),
% 0.08/0.31    inference(boolean_simplification,[],[f9])).
% 0.08/0.31  thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.08/0.31    ( ! [X0 : $o > $o] : (((X0 @ ((~ p) & p)) != $true) | ((X0 @ $true) = $true)) )),
% 0.08/0.31    inference(boolean_simplification,[],[f8])).
% 0.08/0.31  thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.08/0.31    ( ! [X0 : $o > $o] : (((X0 @ ((~ p) | p)) = $true) | ((X0 @ ((~ p) & p)) != $true)) )),
% 0.08/0.31    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7])).
% 0.08/0.31  thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.08/0.31    ! [X0 : $o > $o] : (((X0 @ ((~ p) & p)) != $true) | ((X0 @ ((~ p) | p)) = $true))),
% 0.08/0.31    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f6])).
% 0.08/0.31  thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.08/0.31    ~? [X0 : $o > $o] : (((X0 @ ((~ p) | p)) != $true) & ((X0 @ ((~ p) & p)) = $true))),
% 0.08/0.31    inference(flattening,[],[f5])).
% 0.08/0.31  thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.08/0.31    ~? [X0 : $o > $o] : (((X0 @ ((~ p) & p)) = $true) & ~((X0 @ ((~ p) | p)) = $true))),
% 0.08/0.31    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4])).
% 0.08/0.31  thf(f4,plain,(
% 0.08/0.31    ~? [X0 : $o > $o] : ((X0 @ p & ~p) & ~(X0 @ p | ~p))),
% 0.08/0.31    inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 0.08/0.31  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.08/0.31    ~? [X0 : $o > $o] : ((X0 @ p & ~p) & ~(X0 @ p | ~p))),
% 0.08/0.31    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.08/0.31  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.08/0.31    ? [X0 : $o > $o] : ((X0 @ p & ~p) & ~(X0 @ p | ~p))),
% 0.08/0.31    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM124)).
% 0.08/0.31  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.08/0.31  % (12093)------------------------------
% 0.08/0.31  % (12093)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.08/0.31  % (12093)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.08/0.31  
% 0.08/0.31  % (12093)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.08/0.31  % (12093)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.08/0.31  % (12093)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.08/0.31  % (12093)------------------------------
% 0.08/0.31  % (12093)------------------------------
% 0.08/0.31  % (12087)Success in time 0.014 s
% 0.08/0.31  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------