TSTP Solution File: SYO252^5 by Duper---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SYO252^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 04:21:58 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.33s 3.63s
% Output   : Proof 3.33s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem    : SYO252^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.15  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime   : Sat Aug 26 03:18:56 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.33/3.63  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.33/3.63  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.33/3.63  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (∀ (Xp : Prop), Exists fun Xf => Not (Xf Xp))) True
% 3.33/3.63  Clause #1 (by clausification #[0]): Eq (∀ (Xp : Prop), Exists fun Xf => Not (Xf Xp)) False
% 3.33/3.63  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): ∀ (a : Prop), Eq (Not (Exists fun Xf => Not (Xf (skS.0 0 a)))) True
% 3.33/3.63  Clause #3 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a : Prop), Eq (Exists fun Xf => Not (Xf (skS.0 0 a))) False
% 3.33/3.63  Clause #4 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a : Prop → Prop) (a_1 : Prop), Eq (Not (a (skS.0 0 a_1))) False
% 3.33/3.63  Clause #5 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a : Prop → Prop) (a_1 : Prop), Eq (a (skS.0 0 a_1)) True
% 3.33/3.63  Clause #6 (by identity loobHoist #[5]): ∀ (a : Prop → Prop) (a_1 : Prop), Or (Eq (a True) True) (Eq (skS.0 0 a_1) False)
% 3.33/3.63  Clause #7 (by identity boolHoist #[5]): ∀ (a : Prop → Prop) (a_1 : Prop), Or (Eq (a False) True) (Eq (skS.0 0 a_1) True)
% 3.33/3.63  Clause #8 (by identity loobHoist #[6]): ∀ (a : Prop → Prop) (a_1 : Prop), Or (Eq (a True) True) (Or (Eq (skS.0 0 True) False) (Eq a_1 False))
% 3.33/3.63  Clause #10 (by identity loobHoist #[7]): ∀ (a : Prop → Prop) (a_1 : Prop), Or (Eq (a False) True) (Or (Eq (skS.0 0 True) True) (Eq a_1 False))
% 3.33/3.63  Clause #12 (by falseElim #[10]): ∀ (a : Prop → Prop), Or (Eq (a False) True) (Eq (skS.0 0 True) True)
% 3.33/3.63  Clause #13 (by superposition #[12, 8]): ∀ (a a_1 : Prop → Prop) (a_2 : Prop),
% 3.33/3.63    Or (Eq (a False) True) (Or (Eq (a_1 True) True) (Or (Eq True False) (Eq a_2 False)))
% 3.33/3.63  Clause #20 (by clausification #[13]): ∀ (a a_1 : Prop → Prop) (a_2 : Prop), Or (Eq (a False) True) (Or (Eq (a_1 True) True) (Eq a_2 False))
% 3.33/3.63  Clause #22 (by falseElim #[20]): ∀ (a a_1 : Prop → Prop), Or (Eq (a False) True) (Eq (a_1 True) True)
% 3.33/3.63  Clause #44 (by equality factoring #[22]): Or (Ne True True) (Eq ((fun x => x) False) True)
% 3.33/3.63  Clause #46 (by betaEtaReduce #[44]): Or (Ne True True) (Eq False True)
% 3.33/3.63  Clause #47 (by clausification #[46]): Or (Eq False True) (Or (Eq True False) (Eq True False))
% 3.33/3.63  Clause #49 (by clausification #[47]): Or (Eq True False) (Eq True False)
% 3.33/3.63  Clause #50 (by clausification #[49]): Eq True False
% 3.33/3.63  Clause #51 (by clausification #[50]): False
% 3.33/3.63  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------