TSTP Solution File: SYO236^5 by Isabelle-HOT---2016

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Isabelle-HOT---2016
% Problem  : SYO236^5 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : isabelle tptp_isabelle_hot %d %s

% Computer : n054.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32218.75MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jan 18 19:27:59 EST 2017

% Result   : Theorem 125.36s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYO236^5 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : isabelle tptp_isabelle_hot %d %s
% 0.03/0.23  % Computer : n054.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.23  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.23  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.23  % Memory   : 32218.75MB
% 0.03/0.23  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.23  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.23  % DateTime : Mon Jan 16 04:49:33 CST 2017
% 0.03/0.23  % CPUTime: 
% 125.36/108.50  running nitpick for 7 s
% 125.36/108.50  FAILURE: nitpick
% 125.36/108.50  running simp for 15 s
% 125.36/108.50  FAILURE: simp
% 125.36/108.50  running blast for 15 s
% 125.36/108.50  FAILURE: blast
% 125.36/108.50  running auto+spass for 30 s
% 125.36/108.50  FAILURE: auto+spass
% 125.36/108.50  running fast for 15 s
% 125.36/108.50  FAILURE: fast
% 125.36/108.50  running z3 for 7 s
% 125.36/108.50  SMT: Solver z3: Counterexample found (possibly spurious)
% 125.36/108.50  FAILURE: z3
% 125.36/108.50  running cvc4 for 7 s
% 125.36/108.50  SMT: Solver cvc4: Potential counterexample found
% 125.36/108.50  FAILURE: cvc4
% 125.36/108.50  running best for 7 s
% 125.36/108.50  FAILURE: best
% 125.36/108.50  running force for 15 s
% 125.36/108.50  FAILURE: force
% 125.36/108.50  running meson for 15 s
% 125.36/108.50  FAILURE: meson
% 125.36/108.50  running fastforce for 15 s
% 125.36/108.50  FAILURE: fastforce
% 125.36/108.50  running spass for 18 s
% 125.36/108.50  FAILURE: spass
% 125.36/108.50  running vampire for 18 s
% 125.36/108.50  FAILURE: vampire
% 125.36/108.50  running e for 18 s
% 125.36/108.50  FAILURE: e
% 125.36/108.50  running z3_tptp for 18 s
% 125.36/108.50  FAILURE: z3_tptp
% 125.36/108.50  running spass(1) for 9 s
% 125.36/108.50  FAILURE: spass(1)
% 125.36/108.50  running e(2) for 9 s
% 125.36/108.50  SUCCESS: e(2)
% 125.36/108.50  % SZS status Theorem
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------