TSTP Solution File: SYO233^5 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SYO233^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 09:03:35 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.37s
% Output : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYO233^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon May 20 08:37:08 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.14/0.35 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.37 % (27861)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 % (27860)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 % (27861)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.37 % (27860)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.14/0.37 % (27861)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.37 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.37 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.37 thf(func_def_0, type, cN: $i > $i).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(func_def_1, type, cM: $i > $i).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(func_def_7, type, ph1: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f24,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37 $false),
% 0.14/0.37 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f23])).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f23,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37 ((cN @ sK2) != (cN @ sK2))),
% 0.14/0.37 inference(superposition,[],[f10,f11])).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f11,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((cM @ X0) = (cN @ X0))) )),
% 0.14/0.37 inference(leibniz_equality_elimination,[],[f8])).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37 ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i > $o] : (((X1 @ (cM @ X0)) != $true) | ((X1 @ (cN @ X0)) = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.37 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7])).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37 (cM != cN) & ! [X0,X1 : $i > $o] : (((X1 @ (cM @ X0)) != $true) | ((X1 @ (cN @ X0)) = $true))),
% 0.14/0.37 inference(rectify,[],[f6])).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37 (cM != cN) & ! [X1,X0 : $i > $o] : (($true != (X0 @ (cM @ X1))) | ($true = (X0 @ (cN @ X1))))),
% 0.14/0.37 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5])).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37 ~(! [X0 : $i > $o,X1] : (($true = (X0 @ (cM @ X1))) => ($true = (X0 @ (cN @ X1)))) => (cM = cN))),
% 0.14/0.37 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4])).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f4,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37 ~(! [X0 : $i > $o,X1] : ((X0 @ (cM @ X1)) => (X0 @ (cN @ X1))) => (cM = cN))),
% 0.14/0.37 inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.14/0.37 ~(! [X1 : $i > $o,X0] : ((X1 @ (cM @ X0)) => (X1 @ (cN @ X0))) => (cM = cN))),
% 0.14/0.37 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.14/0.37 ! [X1 : $i > $o,X0] : ((X1 @ (cM @ X0)) => (X1 @ (cN @ X0))) => (cM = cN)),
% 0.14/0.37 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cLEIBNIZ)).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37 ((cM @ sK2) != (cN @ sK2))),
% 0.14/0.37 inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f9])).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37 (cM != cN)),
% 0.14/0.37 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7])).
% 0.14/0.37 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.37 % (27861)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37 % (27861)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.37 % (27861)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 % (27861)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.37 % (27861)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.37 % (27861)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.14/0.37 % (27861)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37 % (27861)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37 % (27853)Success in time 0.016 s
% 0.14/0.37 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------