TSTP Solution File: SYO215^5 by Duper---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Duper---1.0
% Problem : SYO215^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : duper %s
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 04:21:52 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 3.34s 3.72s
% Output : Proof 3.34s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYO215^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : duper %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 02:20:47 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 3.34/3.72 SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.34/3.72 SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.34/3.72 Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not ((Exists fun X => Exists fun Y => Ne X Y) → ∀ (U : Iota), Exists fun Z => Ne Z U)) True
% 3.34/3.72 Clause #1 (by betaEtaReduce #[0]): Eq (Not ((Exists fun X => Exists (Ne X)) → ∀ (U : Iota), Exists fun Z => Ne Z U)) True
% 3.34/3.72 Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): Eq ((Exists fun X => Exists (Ne X)) → ∀ (U : Iota), Exists fun Z => Ne Z U) False
% 3.34/3.72 Clause #3 (by clausification #[2]): Eq (Exists fun X => Exists (Ne X)) True
% 3.34/3.72 Clause #4 (by clausification #[2]): Eq (∀ (U : Iota), Exists fun Z => Ne Z U) False
% 3.34/3.72 Clause #5 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Exists (Ne (skS.0 0 a))) True
% 3.34/3.72 Clause #6 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (Ne (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1)) True
% 3.34/3.72 Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Ne (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1)
% 3.34/3.72 Clause #8 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Not (Exists fun Z => Ne Z (skS.0 2 a))) True
% 3.34/3.72 Clause #9 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Exists fun Z => Ne Z (skS.0 2 a)) False
% 3.34/3.72 Clause #10 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (Ne a (skS.0 2 a_1)) False
% 3.34/3.72 Clause #11 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq a (skS.0 2 a_1)
% 3.34/3.72 Clause #13 (by superposition #[11, 11]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq a a_1
% 3.34/3.72 Clause #14 (by backward contextual literal cutting #[13, 7]): False
% 3.34/3.72 SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------