TSTP Solution File: SYO195_8 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SYO195_8 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:43:48 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYO195_8 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 15:55:29 EDT 2023
% 0.21/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.PNK4ZYvGy5/E---3.1_11288.p
% 0.22/0.49 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.22/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # new_bool_3 with pid 11414 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.22/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.49 # Search class: FUHPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 11419 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.22/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.49 # Search class: FUHPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.49
% 0.22/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.49 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.22/0.49 fof(cCT25, conjecture, ~(![X1:$o, X2:$o]:((X1<=>X2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.PNK4ZYvGy5/E---3.1_11288.p', cCT25)).
% 0.22/0.49 fof(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(~(![X1:$o, X2:$o]:((X1<=>X2)))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cCT25])).
% 0.22/0.49 fof(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$o, X4:$o]:(((~X3|X4)&(~X4|X3))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])).
% 0.22/0.49 cnf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]), ['proof']).
% 0.22/0.49 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.22/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.22/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Initial clauses : 2
% 0.22/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2
% 0.22/0.49 # Processed clauses : 1
% 0.22/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.22/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 57
% 0.22/0.49
% 0.22/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.49 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.49 # System time : 0.000 s
% 0.22/0.49 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1628 pages
% 0.22/0.49
% 0.22/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.49 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.49 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.49 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.22/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1656 pages
% 0.22/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------