TSTP Solution File: SYO194^5 by cocATP---0.2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : cocATP---0.2.0
% Problem : SYO194^5 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 0s
% DateTime : Tue Mar 29 00:50:52 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.60s 0.80s
% Output : Proof 0.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : SYO194^5 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.12 % Command : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUModel : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % RAMPerCPU : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Mar 11 17:39:04 EST 2022
% 0.19/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.34 ModuleCmd_Load.c(213):ERROR:105: Unable to locate a modulefile for 'python/python27'
% 0.19/0.34 Python 2.7.5
% 0.60/0.80 Using paths ['/home/cristobal/cocATP/CASC/TPTP/', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/']
% 0.60/0.80 FOF formula (forall (Xx:fofType), ((ex (fofType->fofType)) (fun (Xf:(fofType->fofType))=> (((eq fofType) (Xf Xx)) Xx)))) of role conjecture named cCT23
% 0.60/0.80 Conjecture to prove = (forall (Xx:fofType), ((ex (fofType->fofType)) (fun (Xf:(fofType->fofType))=> (((eq fofType) (Xf Xx)) Xx)))):Prop
% 0.60/0.80 Parameter fofType_DUMMY:fofType.
% 0.60/0.80 We need to prove ['(forall (Xx:fofType), ((ex (fofType->fofType)) (fun (Xf:(fofType->fofType))=> (((eq fofType) (Xf Xx)) Xx))))']
% 0.60/0.80 Parameter fofType:Type.
% 0.60/0.80 Trying to prove (forall (Xx:fofType), ((ex (fofType->fofType)) (fun (Xf:(fofType->fofType))=> (((eq fofType) (Xf Xx)) Xx))))
% 0.60/0.80 Found eq_ref00:=(eq_ref0 (x Xx)):(((eq fofType) (x Xx)) (x Xx))
% 0.60/0.80 Found (eq_ref0 (x Xx)) as proof of (((eq fofType) (x Xx)) Xx)
% 0.60/0.80 Found ((eq_ref fofType) (x Xx)) as proof of (((eq fofType) (x Xx)) Xx)
% 0.60/0.80 Found ((eq_ref fofType) (x Xx)) as proof of (((eq fofType) (x Xx)) Xx)
% 0.60/0.80 Found ((eq_ref fofType) (x Xx)) as proof of (((eq fofType) (x Xx)) Xx)
% 0.60/0.80 Found (ex_intro000 ((eq_ref fofType) (x Xx))) as proof of ((ex (fofType->fofType)) (fun (Xf:(fofType->fofType))=> (((eq fofType) (Xf Xx)) Xx)))
% 0.60/0.80 Found ((ex_intro00 (fun (x2:fofType)=> x2)) ((eq_ref fofType) ((fun (x2:fofType)=> x2) Xx))) as proof of ((ex (fofType->fofType)) (fun (Xf:(fofType->fofType))=> (((eq fofType) (Xf Xx)) Xx)))
% 0.60/0.80 Found (((ex_intro0 (fun (Xf:(fofType->fofType))=> (((eq fofType) (Xf Xx)) Xx))) (fun (x2:fofType)=> x2)) ((eq_ref fofType) ((fun (x2:fofType)=> x2) Xx))) as proof of ((ex (fofType->fofType)) (fun (Xf:(fofType->fofType))=> (((eq fofType) (Xf Xx)) Xx)))
% 0.60/0.80 Found ((((ex_intro (fofType->fofType)) (fun (Xf:(fofType->fofType))=> (((eq fofType) (Xf Xx)) Xx))) (fun (x2:fofType)=> x2)) ((eq_ref fofType) ((fun (x2:fofType)=> x2) Xx))) as proof of ((ex (fofType->fofType)) (fun (Xf:(fofType->fofType))=> (((eq fofType) (Xf Xx)) Xx)))
% 0.60/0.80 Found (fun (Xx:fofType)=> ((((ex_intro (fofType->fofType)) (fun (Xf:(fofType->fofType))=> (((eq fofType) (Xf Xx)) Xx))) (fun (x2:fofType)=> x2)) ((eq_ref fofType) ((fun (x2:fofType)=> x2) Xx)))) as proof of ((ex (fofType->fofType)) (fun (Xf:(fofType->fofType))=> (((eq fofType) (Xf Xx)) Xx)))
% 0.60/0.80 Found (fun (Xx:fofType)=> ((((ex_intro (fofType->fofType)) (fun (Xf:(fofType->fofType))=> (((eq fofType) (Xf Xx)) Xx))) (fun (x2:fofType)=> x2)) ((eq_ref fofType) ((fun (x2:fofType)=> x2) Xx)))) as proof of (forall (Xx:fofType), ((ex (fofType->fofType)) (fun (Xf:(fofType->fofType))=> (((eq fofType) (Xf Xx)) Xx))))
% 0.60/0.80 Got proof (fun (Xx:fofType)=> ((((ex_intro (fofType->fofType)) (fun (Xf:(fofType->fofType))=> (((eq fofType) (Xf Xx)) Xx))) (fun (x2:fofType)=> x2)) ((eq_ref fofType) ((fun (x2:fofType)=> x2) Xx))))
% 0.60/0.80 Time elapsed = 0.182504s
% 0.60/0.80 node=43 cost=50.000000 depth=9
% 0.60/0.80 ::::::::::::::::::::::
% 0.60/0.80 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/0.80 % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/0.80 (fun (Xx:fofType)=> ((((ex_intro (fofType->fofType)) (fun (Xf:(fofType->fofType))=> (((eq fofType) (Xf Xx)) Xx))) (fun (x2:fofType)=> x2)) ((eq_ref fofType) ((fun (x2:fofType)=> x2) Xx))))
% 0.60/0.80 % SZS output end Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------