TSTP Solution File: SYO190^5 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SYO190^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 09:03:25 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.37s
% Output : Refutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 7 ( 2 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 11 ( 5 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 6 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of FOOLs : 16 ( 5 fml; 11 var)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 0 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 3 !; 8 ?; 11 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(f11,plain,
$false,
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f8]) ).
tff(f8,plain,
! [X0: $o] : ( $true != (X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).
tff(f7,plain,
! [X0: $o,X1: $o] :
( ( $true != (X1) )
& ( $true != (X0) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
tff(f6,plain,
~ ? [X0: $o,X1: $o] :
( ( $true = (X1) )
| ( $true = (X0) ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f5]) ).
tff(f5,plain,
~ ? [X0: $o,X1: $o] :
( (X0)
| (X1) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).
tff(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X0: $o,X1: $o] :
( (X0)
| (X1) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).
tff(f1,conjecture,
? [X0: $o,X1: $o] :
( (X0)
| (X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cCT15) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SYO190^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 20 10:28:38 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.13/0.35 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.36 % (29912)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.13/0.36 % (29913)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.13/0.36 % (29914)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.13/0.36 % (29913)First to succeed.
% 0.13/0.36 % (29915)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (29913)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.13/0.37 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.37 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.37 % (29913)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (29913)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.13/0.37 % (29913)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 % (29913)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.13/0.37 % (29913)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.37 % (29913)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.13/0.37 % (29913)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (29913)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (29909)Success in time 0.005 s
% 0.13/0.37 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------