TSTP Solution File: SYO180_8 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SYO180_8 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:48:06 EDT 2023

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 0.22s 0.50s
% Output   : Saturation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_4)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    epred7_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    epred2_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( epred11_0
    | ~ epred9_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ~ epred1_11($false,$true,$false,X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,$false,X10,X11),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ~ epred1_11(X5,X6,X7,$false,X8,$true,$false,X9,X10,$false,X11),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ~ epred1_11(X5,$true,X6,X7,X8,$false,$false,X9,X10,$false,X11),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ~ epred1_11(X5,X6,$false,X7,X8,$true,$false,X9,$true,X10,X11),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ~ epred1_11($true,X5,$false,X6,$true,X7,X8,X9,$false,X10,X11),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ~ epred1_11($false,$false,$false,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,X10,X11),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ~ epred1_11($false,$false,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,X10,$false,X11),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ~ epred1_11(X4,X5,X6,$false,X7,X8,X9,X10,$true,X11,$true),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ~ epred1_11(X4,X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,X10,X11,$false,$true,$true),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ~ epred1_11(X4,X5,$true,$false,$true,X6,X7,X8,X9,X10,X11),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ~ epred1_11($true,$false,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,$false,X10,X11),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ~ epred1_11($true,$false,X5,$true,$true,X6,X7,X8,X9,X10,X11),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ~ epred1_11(X4,$true,X5,$true,X6,X7,X8,$true,X9,X10,X11),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ~ epred1_11($true,X6,$false,X7,X8,$false,X9,$true,$true,X10,X11),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ~ epred1_11(X5,X6,$true,X7,X8,X9,X10,$true,$true,X11,$true),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    epred1_11(epred5_0,epred6_0,epred10_0,epred12_0,epred11_0,epred8_0,epred9_0,$true,epred4_0,epred3_0,$true),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8]),
    [final] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : SYO180_8 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 15:21:31 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.49  Running first-order model finding
% 0.22/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jFZv0kZZXc/E---3.1_24797.p
% 0.22/0.50  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.22/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50  # sh5l with pid 24878 completed with status 1
% 0.22/0.50  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.22/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.22/0.50  # Search class: FHUNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFBN
% 0.22/0.50  # partial match(1): FHUNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.50  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.50  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 24879 completed with status 1
% 0.22/0.50  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.22/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.22/0.50  # Search class: FHUNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFBN
% 0.22/0.50  # partial match(1): FHUNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.50  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.50  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.50  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.50  
% 0.22/0.50  # No proof found!
% 0.22/0.50  # SZS status CounterSatisfiable
% 0.22/0.50  # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.50  # Parsed axioms                        : 1
% 0.22/0.50  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.22/0.50  # Initial clauses                      : 19
% 0.22/0.50  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.22/0.50  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 19
% 0.22/0.50  # Processed clauses                    : 38
% 0.22/0.50  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.22/0.50  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.22/0.50  # ...remaining for further processing  : 38
% 0.22/0.50  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.22/0.50  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/0.50  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.22/0.50  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.22/0.50  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.22/0.50  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.22/0.50  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.22/0.50  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.22/0.50  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.22/0.50  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.22/0.50  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.22/0.50  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.22/0.50  # Total rewrite steps                  : 2
% 0.22/0.50  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.22/0.50  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.22/0.50  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.50  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.22/0.50  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.50  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.22/0.50  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.22/0.50  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.22/0.50  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.22/0.50  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.22/0.50  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.22/0.50  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.22/0.50  # Current number of processed clauses  : 19
% 0.22/0.50  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 0.22/0.50  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.50  #    Negative unit clauses             : 15
% 0.22/0.50  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
% 0.22/0.50  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.50  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.22/0.50  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/0.50  # Current number of archived clauses   : 19
% 0.22/0.50  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.22/0.50  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.50  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.22/0.50  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 42
% 0.22/0.50  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/0.50  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.22/0.50  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.22/0.50  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/0.50  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/0.50  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1483
% 0.22/0.50  
% 0.22/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.50  # User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.22/0.50  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.50  # Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.22/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1736 pages
% 0.22/0.50  
% 0.22/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.50  # User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.22/0.50  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.50  # Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.22/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 0.22/0.50  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------