TSTP Solution File: SYO145^5 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SYO145^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 09:03:08 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.37s
% Output   : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : SYO145^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 09:12:22 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.35  This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.14/0.35  Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.36  % (30011)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.14/0.36  % (30016)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.14/0.36  % (30017)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.14/0.36  % (30010)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (30016)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.37  % (30017)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.14/0.37  % (30010)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.14/0.37  % (30016)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.37  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.37  thf(func_def_0, type, cP: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.37  thf(func_def_4, type, sK0: $i > $i).
% 0.14/0.37  thf(f15,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37    $false),
% 0.14/0.37    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f14])).
% 0.14/0.37  thf(f14,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37    ($true != $true)),
% 0.14/0.37    inference(superposition,[],[f13,f11])).
% 0.14/0.37  thf(f11,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37    ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((cP @ X0 @ (sK0 @ X0)) = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.37    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9])).
% 0.14/0.37  thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37    ! [X0] : ((cP @ X0 @ (sK0 @ X0)) = $true) & ! [X3,X4] : (((cP @ X3 @ X4) != $true) | ($true != (cP @ sK1 @ X3)))),
% 0.14/0.37    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f6,f8,f7])).
% 0.14/0.37  thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37    ! [X0] : (? [X1] : ((cP @ X0 @ X1) = $true) => ((cP @ X0 @ (sK0 @ X0)) = $true))),
% 0.14/0.37    introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.14/0.37  thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37    ? [X2] : ! [X3,X4] : (((cP @ X3 @ X4) != $true) | ($true != (cP @ X2 @ X3))) => ! [X4,X3] : (((cP @ X3 @ X4) != $true) | ($true != (cP @ sK1 @ X3)))),
% 0.14/0.37    introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.14/0.37  thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37    ! [X0] : ? [X1] : ((cP @ X0 @ X1) = $true) & ? [X2] : ! [X3,X4] : (((cP @ X3 @ X4) != $true) | ($true != (cP @ X2 @ X3)))),
% 0.14/0.37    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5])).
% 0.14/0.37  thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37    ~(! [X0] : ? [X1] : ((cP @ X0 @ X1) = $true) => ! [X2] : ? [X4,X3] : (((cP @ X3 @ X4) = $true) & ($true = (cP @ X2 @ X3))))),
% 0.14/0.37    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4])).
% 0.14/0.37  thf(f4,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37    ~(! [X0] : ? [X1] : (cP @ X0 @ X1) => ! [X2] : ? [X3,X4] : ((cP @ X3 @ X4) & (cP @ X2 @ X3)))),
% 0.14/0.37    inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 0.14/0.37  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.14/0.37    ~(! [X0] : ? [X1] : (cP @ X0 @ X1) => ! [X0] : ? [X1,X2] : ((cP @ X1 @ X2) & (cP @ X0 @ X1)))),
% 0.14/0.37    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.14/0.37  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.14/0.37    ! [X0] : ? [X1] : (cP @ X0 @ X1) => ! [X0] : ? [X1,X2] : ((cP @ X1 @ X2) & (cP @ X0 @ X1))),
% 0.14/0.37    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cEXPVAR_BUG)).
% 0.14/0.37  thf(f13,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37    ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((cP @ (sK0 @ sK1) @ X0) != $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.37    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f12])).
% 0.14/0.37  thf(f12,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37    ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((cP @ (sK0 @ sK1) @ X0) != $true) | ($true != $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.37    inference(superposition,[],[f10,f11])).
% 0.14/0.37  thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37    ( ! [X3 : $i,X4 : $i] : (($true != (cP @ sK1 @ X3)) | ((cP @ X3 @ X4) != $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.37    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9])).
% 0.14/0.37  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.37  % (30016)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (30016)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.37  % (30016)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  % (30016)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.37  % (30016)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.37  % (30016)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.37  % (30016)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (30016)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (30009)Success in time 0.016 s
% 0.14/0.37  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------