TSTP Solution File: SYO087^5 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SYO087^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 09:02:53 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.36s
% Output : Refutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 5 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 175 ( 48 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 12 avg)
% Number of connectives : 109 ( 44 ~; 16 |; 39 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 10 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg)
% Number of FOOLs : 96 ( 96 fml; 0 var)
% Number of types : 0 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 3 usr; 5 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 0 !; 2 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(f22,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f10,f21]) ).
tff(f21,plain,
cP = $true,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f12,f20]) ).
tff(f20,plain,
cQ = $true,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f18,f11]) ).
tff(f11,plain,
cR != $true,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).
tff(f9,plain,
( ( ( ( cQ = $true )
& ( cR != $true ) )
| ( ( cQ != $true )
& ( cR = $true ) ) )
& ( ( ( cP != $true )
& ( cQ != $true ) )
| ( ( cQ = $true )
& ( cP = $true ) ) )
& ( cR != $true )
& ( cP != $true ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f8]) ).
tff(f8,plain,
( ( cR != $true )
& ( ( ( cP != $true )
& ( cQ != $true ) )
| ( ( cQ = $true )
& ( cP = $true ) ) )
& ( ( ( cQ = $true )
& ( cR != $true ) )
| ( ( cQ != $true )
& ( cR = $true ) ) )
& ( cP != $true ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).
tff(f7,plain,
~ ( ( ( ( ( cQ = $true )
& ( cR != $true ) )
| ( ( cQ != $true )
& ( cR = $true ) ) )
& ( cP != $true ) )
=> ( ( ( ( cP != $true )
& ( cQ != $true ) )
| ( ( cQ = $true )
& ( cP = $true ) ) )
=> ( cR = $true ) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f6]) ).
tff(f6,plain,
~ ( ( ( ( ( cQ != $true )
& ( cR = $true ) )
| ( ( cQ = $true )
& ( cR != $true ) ) )
& ( cP != $true ) )
=> ( ( ( ( cQ = $true )
& ( cP = $true ) )
| ( ( cP != $true )
& ( cQ != $true ) ) )
=> ( cR = $true ) ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f5]) ).
tff(f5,plain,
~ ( ( ( ( ~ cQ
& cR )
| ( cQ
& ~ cR ) )
& ~ cP )
=> ( ( ( cQ
& cP )
| ( ~ cP
& ~ cQ ) )
=> cR ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).
tff(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X0] :
( ( ( ( ~ cQ
& cR )
| ( cQ
& ~ cR ) )
& ~ cP )
=> ( ( ( cQ
& cP )
| ( ~ cP
& ~ cQ ) )
=> cR ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).
tff(f1,conjecture,
? [X0] :
( ( ( ( ~ cQ
& cR )
| ( cQ
& ~ cR ) )
& ~ cP )
=> ( ( ( cQ
& cP )
| ( ~ cP
& ~ cQ ) )
=> cR ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM50_13) ).
tff(f18,plain,
( ( cR = $true )
| ( cQ = $true ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).
tff(f12,plain,
( ( cP = $true )
| ( cQ != $true ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).
tff(f10,plain,
cP != $true,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : SYO087^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 20 10:00:38 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.12/0.34 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.36 % (21881)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.12/0.36 % (21879)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.12/0.36 % (21880)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.12/0.36 % (21877)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.12/0.36 % (21877)First to succeed.
% 0.12/0.36 % (21884)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.12/0.36 % (21878)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.12/0.36 % (21880)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.12/0.36 % (21882)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.12/0.36 % (21883)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.12/0.36 % (21879)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.12/0.36 % (21877)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.12/0.36 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.36 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.36 % (21877)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36 % (21877)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.12/0.36 % (21877)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 % (21877)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.12/0.36 % (21877)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.12/0.36 % (21877)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.12/0.36 % (21877)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36 % (21877)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36 % (21876)Success in time 0.012 s
% 0.12/0.36 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------