TSTP Solution File: SYO043^1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SYO043^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 09:02:25 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.07s 0.28s
% Output : Refutation 0.07s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 47 ( 4 unt; 3 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 249 ( 40 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 167 ( 42 ~; 44 |; 6 &; 69 @)
% ( 6 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 4 ( 4 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 13 ( 10 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 1 ( 0 ^ 0 !; 0 ?; 1 :)
% ( 1 !>; 0 ?*; 0 @-; 0 @+)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_0,type,
f: $o > $o ).
thf(func_def_1,type,
q: ( $o > $o ) > $o > $o ).
thf(func_def_7,type,
ph1:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
thf(f134,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f18,f27,f41,f53,f108,f129,f130,f133]) ).
thf(f133,plain,
( ~ spl0_2
| spl0_5 ),
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f132]) ).
thf(f132,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_2
| spl0_5 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f63,f33]) ).
thf(f33,plain,
( ( $true
!= ( f @ $true ) )
| spl0_5 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f32]) ).
thf(f32,plain,
( spl0_5
<=> ( $true
= ( f @ $true ) ) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_5])]) ).
thf(f63,plain,
( ( $true
= ( f @ $true ) )
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(superposition,[],[f17,f5]) ).
thf(f5,plain,
( ( q @ f @ x )
= $true ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
thf(f4,plain,
( ( ( f @ x )
!= ( f @ ( q @ f @ x ) ) )
& ( ( f @ ( f @ x ) )
= $true )
& ( ( q @ f @ x )
= $true ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f3]) ).
thf(f3,plain,
( ( ( f @ x )
!= ( f @ ( q @ f @ x ) ) )
& ( q @ f @ x )
& ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).
thf(f1,axiom,
( ( ( f @ x )
!= ( f @ ( q @ f @ x ) ) )
& ( q @ f @ x )
& ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',5) ).
thf(f17,plain,
( ( ( f @ ( q @ f @ x ) )
= $true )
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f15]) ).
thf(f15,plain,
( spl0_2
<=> ( ( f @ ( q @ f @ x ) )
= $true ) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).
thf(f130,plain,
( ~ spl0_6
| spl0_1
| ~ spl0_5 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f112,f32,f11,f36]) ).
thf(f36,plain,
( spl0_6
<=> ( x = $true ) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_6])]) ).
thf(f11,plain,
( spl0_1
<=> ( ( f @ x )
= $true ) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).
thf(f112,plain,
( ( x != $true )
| spl0_1
| ~ spl0_5 ),
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f110]) ).
thf(f110,plain,
( ( x != $true )
| ( $true != $true )
| spl0_1
| ~ spl0_5 ),
inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f12,f34]) ).
thf(f34,plain,
( ( $true
= ( f @ $true ) )
| ~ spl0_5 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f32]) ).
thf(f12,plain,
( ( ( f @ x )
!= $true )
| spl0_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f11]) ).
thf(f129,plain,
( spl0_6
| spl0_1 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f128,f11,f36]) ).
thf(f128,plain,
( ( x = $true )
| spl0_1 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f114,f12]) ).
thf(f114,plain,
( ( ( f @ x )
= $true )
| ( x = $true )
| spl0_1 ),
inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f113]) ).
thf(f113,plain,
( ( x
!= ( f @ x ) )
| spl0_1 ),
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f111]) ).
thf(f111,plain,
( ( x
!= ( f @ x ) )
| ( $true != $true )
| spl0_1 ),
inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f12,f6]) ).
thf(f6,plain,
( ( f @ ( f @ x ) )
= $true ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
thf(f108,plain,
( ~ spl0_4
| ~ spl0_5 ),
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f107]) ).
thf(f107,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_4
| ~ spl0_5 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f92,f5]) ).
thf(f92,plain,
( ( ( q @ f @ x )
!= $true )
| ~ spl0_4
| ~ spl0_5 ),
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f80]) ).
thf(f80,plain,
( ( ( q @ f @ x )
!= $true )
| ( $false = $true )
| ~ spl0_4
| ~ spl0_5 ),
inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f34,f26]) ).
thf(f26,plain,
( ( ( f @ ( q @ f @ x ) )
= $false )
| ~ spl0_4 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f24]) ).
thf(f24,plain,
( spl0_4
<=> ( ( f @ ( q @ f @ x ) )
= $false ) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_4])]) ).
thf(f53,plain,
( ~ spl0_1
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f52]) ).
thf(f52,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_1
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f42]) ).
thf(f42,plain,
( ( $false = $true )
| ~ spl0_1
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(superposition,[],[f22,f13]) ).
thf(f13,plain,
( ( ( f @ x )
= $true )
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f11]) ).
thf(f22,plain,
( ( ( f @ x )
= $false )
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f20]) ).
thf(f20,plain,
( spl0_3
<=> ( ( f @ x )
= $false ) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])]) ).
thf(f41,plain,
( spl0_5
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f40,f11,f32]) ).
thf(f40,plain,
( ( $true
= ( f @ $true ) )
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(superposition,[],[f6,f13]) ).
thf(f27,plain,
( spl0_3
| spl0_4 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f9,f24,f20]) ).
thf(f9,plain,
( ( ( f @ x )
= $false )
| ( ( f @ ( q @ f @ x ) )
= $false ) ),
inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f7]) ).
thf(f7,plain,
( ( f @ x )
!= ( f @ ( q @ f @ x ) ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
thf(f18,plain,
( spl0_1
| spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f8,f15,f11]) ).
thf(f8,plain,
( ( ( f @ ( q @ f @ x ) )
= $true )
| ( ( f @ x )
= $true ) ),
inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f7]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.07 % Problem : SYO043^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.07/0.26 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.26 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.26 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.26 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.07/0.26 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.07/0.26 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.26 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.07/0.26 % DateTime : Mon May 20 08:54:22 EDT 2024
% 0.07/0.27 % CPUTime :
% 0.07/0.27 This is a TH0_UNS_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.07/0.27 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.28 % (13622)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.07/0.28 % (13619)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.07/0.28 % (13617)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.07/0.28 % (13618)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.07/0.28 % (13623)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.07/0.28 % (13624)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.07/0.28 % (13621)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.07/0.28 % (13620)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.07/0.28 % (13622)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.07/0.28 % (13622)------------------------------
% 0.07/0.28 % (13622)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.07/0.28 % (13622)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.07/0.28
% 0.07/0.28
% 0.07/0.28 % (13622)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.07/0.28 % (13622)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.07/0.28 % (13622)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.07/0.28 % (13622)------------------------------
% 0.07/0.28 % (13622)------------------------------
% 0.07/0.28 % (13621)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.07/0.28 % (13621)------------------------------
% 0.07/0.28 % (13621)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.07/0.28 % (13621)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.07/0.28
% 0.07/0.28
% 0.07/0.28 % (13621)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.07/0.28 % (13621)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.07/0.28 % (13621)------------------------------
% 0.07/0.28 % (13621)------------------------------
% 0.07/0.28 % (13620)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.07/0.28 % (13620)------------------------------
% 0.07/0.28 % (13620)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.07/0.28 % (13620)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.07/0.28 % (13620)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.07/0.28
% 0.07/0.28 % (13620)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.07/0.28 % (13620)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.07/0.28 % (13620)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.07/0.28 % (13620)------------------------------
% 0.07/0.28 % (13620)------------------------------
% 0.07/0.28 % (13623)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.07/0.28 % (13623)------------------------------
% 0.07/0.28 % (13623)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.07/0.28 % (13623)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.07/0.28
% 0.07/0.28
% 0.07/0.28 % (13623)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.07/0.28 % (13623)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.07/0.28 % (13623)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.07/0.28 % (13623)------------------------------
% 0.07/0.28 % (13623)------------------------------
% 0.07/0.28 % (13624)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.07/0.28 % (13624)------------------------------
% 0.07/0.28 % (13624)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.07/0.28 % (13624)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.07/0.28
% 0.07/0.28
% 0.07/0.28 % (13624)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.07/0.28 % (13624)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.07/0.28 % (13624)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.07/0.28 % (13624)------------------------------
% 0.07/0.28 % (13624)------------------------------
% 0.07/0.28 % (13619)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.07/0.28 % (13619)------------------------------
% 0.07/0.28 % (13619)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.07/0.28 % (13619)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.07/0.28
% 0.07/0.28
% 0.07/0.28 % (13619)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.07/0.28 % (13619)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.07/0.28 % (13619)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.07/0.28 % (13619)------------------------------
% 0.07/0.28 % (13619)------------------------------
% 0.07/0.28 % (13618)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.07/0.28 % (13618)------------------------------
% 0.07/0.28 % (13618)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.07/0.28 % (13618)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.07/0.28 % (13618)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.07/0.28
% 0.07/0.28 % (13618)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.07/0.28 % (13618)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.07/0.28 % (13618)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.07/0.28 % (13618)------------------------------
% 0.07/0.28 % (13618)------------------------------
% 0.07/0.28 % (13617)First to succeed.
% 0.07/0.28 % (13617)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.07/0.28 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.07/0.28 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.07/0.28 % (13617)------------------------------
% 0.07/0.28 % (13617)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.07/0.28 % (13617)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.07/0.28
% 0.07/0.28 % (13617)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.07/0.28 % (13617)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.07/0.28 % (13617)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.07/0.28 % (13617)------------------------------
% 0.07/0.28 % (13617)------------------------------
% 0.07/0.28 % (13616)Success in time 0.004 s
% 0.07/0.28 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------