TSTP Solution File: SYN992^1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SYN992^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:33:33 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.40s
% Output   : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SYN992^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 13:50:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.36  This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.14/0.36  Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.39  % (32669)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.39  % (32669)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.39  % (32669)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39  % (32669)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.39  % (32669)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.39  % (32669)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  % (32669)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.39  % (32669)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.39  % (32669)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.39  % (32669)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39  % (32669)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39  % (32665)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 0.14/0.39  % (32666)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.14/0.39  % (32667)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 0.14/0.39  % (32668)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.39  % (32671)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.14/0.39  % (32670)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 0.14/0.39  % (32672)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.14/0.39  % (32665)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.39  % (32670)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.39  % (32670)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39  % (32670)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.39  % (32667)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.39  % (32667)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39  % (32667)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.39  % (32667)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  % (32667)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.39  % (32667)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.39  % (32667)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.14/0.39  % (32667)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39  % (32667)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39  % (32668)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.39  % (32668)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39  % (32668)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.39  % (32668)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  % (32668)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.39  % (32668)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.39  % (32668)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.14/0.39  % (32668)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39  % (32668)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40  % (32670)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  % (32670)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.14/0.40  % (32670)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.40  % (32670)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.14/0.40  % (32670)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40  % (32670)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40  % (32666)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.14/0.40  % (32672)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.40  % (32672)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40  % (32672)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.40  % (32672)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  % (32672)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.14/0.40  % (32672)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.40  % (32672)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.14/0.40  % (32672)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40  % (32672)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40  % (32665)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.40  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.40  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.40  thf(func_def_0, type, refl: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
% 0.14/0.40  thf(func_def_9, type, sK1: ($i > $i > $o) > $i).
% 0.14/0.40  thf(func_def_10, type, ph2: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 0.14/0.40  thf(f17,plain,(
% 0.14/0.40    $false),
% 0.14/0.40    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f16])).
% 0.14/0.40  thf(f16,plain,(
% 0.14/0.40    ($false != $false)),
% 0.14/0.40    inference(superposition,[],[f4,f15])).
% 0.14/0.40  thf(f15,plain,(
% 0.14/0.40    ( ! [X0 : $i > $i > $o] : (((X0 @ (sK1 @ X0) @ (sK1 @ X0)) = $false)) )),
% 0.14/0.40    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f14])).
% 0.14/0.40  thf(f14,plain,(
% 0.14/0.40    ( ! [X0 : $i > $i > $o] : ((((^[Y0 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0 @ Y0)) @ (sK1 @ X0)) = $false)) )),
% 0.14/0.40    inference(sigma_clausification,[],[f13])).
% 0.14/0.40  thf(f13,plain,(
% 0.14/0.40    ( ! [X0 : $i > $i > $o] : (($true != (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0 @ Y0))))) )),
% 0.14/0.40    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f12])).
% 0.14/0.40  thf(f12,plain,(
% 0.14/0.40    ( ! [X0 : $i > $i > $o] : ((((^[Y0 : $i > $i > $o]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (Y0 @ Y1 @ Y1)))) @ X0) != $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.40    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f10,f11])).
% 0.14/0.40  thf(f11,plain,(
% 0.14/0.40    (refl = (^[Y0 : $i > $i > $o]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (Y0 @ Y1 @ Y1)))))),
% 0.14/0.40    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8])).
% 0.14/0.40  thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.14/0.40    (refl = (^[Y0 : $i > $i > $o]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (Y0 @ Y1 @ Y1)))))),
% 0.14/0.40    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f7])).
% 0.14/0.40  thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.14/0.40    (refl = (^[X0 : $i > $i > $o] : (! [X1] : (X0 @ X1 @ X1))))),
% 0.14/0.40    inference(rectify,[],[f1])).
% 0.14/0.40  thf(f1,axiom,(
% 0.14/0.40    (refl = (^[X0 : $i > $i > $o] : (! [X1] : (X0 @ X1 @ X1))))),
% 0.14/0.40    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',refl)).
% 0.14/0.40  thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.14/0.40    ( ! [X0 : $i > $i > $o] : (((refl @ X0) != $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.40    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9])).
% 0.14/0.40  thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.14/0.40    ! [X0 : $i > $i > $o] : ((refl @ X0) != $true)),
% 0.14/0.40    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f6])).
% 0.14/0.40  thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.14/0.40    ~? [X0 : $i > $i > $o] : ((refl @ X0) = $true)),
% 0.14/0.40    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f5])).
% 0.14/0.40  thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.14/0.40    ~? [X0 : $i > $i > $o] : (refl @ X0)),
% 0.14/0.40    inference(rectify,[],[f3])).
% 0.14/0.40  thf(f3,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.14/0.40    ~? [X0 : $i > $i > $o] : (refl @ X0)),
% 0.14/0.40    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f2])).
% 0.14/0.40  thf(f2,conjecture,(
% 0.14/0.40    ? [X0 : $i > $i > $o] : (refl @ X0)),
% 0.14/0.40    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax)).
% 0.14/0.40  thf(f4,plain,(
% 0.14/0.40    ($true != $false)),
% 0.14/0.40    introduced(fool_axiom,[])).
% 0.14/0.40  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.40  % (32665)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40  % (32665)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.40  % (32665)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  % (32665)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.40  % (32665)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.40  % (32665)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.14/0.40  % (32665)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40  % (32665)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40  % (32664)Success in time 0.027 s
% 0.14/0.40  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------