TSTP Solution File: SYN980+1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : SYN980+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:32:27 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.44s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 9 unt; 1 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 17 ( 0 equ; 8 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
( r(skc1)
| p(f(u),u) ),
file('SYN980+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(2,axiom,
( ~ r(u)
| p(f(u),u) ),
file('SYN980+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(3,axiom,
( ~ p(u,v)
| q(f(skc1),skc1) ),
file('SYN980+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(4,axiom,
( ~ p(u,v)
| ~ q(u,v) ),
file('SYN980+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(6,plain,
~ p(u,v),
inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s1)])],[3]),
[iquote('1:Spt:3.0')] ).
cnf(7,plain,
r(skc1),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[1,6]),
[iquote('1:MRR:1.1,6.0')] ).
cnf(8,plain,
~ r(u),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[2,6]),
[iquote('1:MRR:2.1,6.0')] ).
cnf(9,plain,
$false,
inference(unc,[status(thm)],[8,7]),
[iquote('1:UnC:8.0,7.0')] ).
cnf(10,plain,
q(f(skc1),skc1),
inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s2)])],[3]),
[iquote('1:Spt:9.0,3.1')] ).
cnf(11,plain,
~ p(f(skc1),skc1),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[10,4]),
[iquote('1:Res:10.0,4.1')] ).
cnf(12,plain,
~ r(skc1),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2,11]),
[iquote('1:Res:2.1,11.0')] ).
cnf(13,plain,
r(skc1),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,11]),
[iquote('1:Res:1.1,11.0')] ).
cnf(14,plain,
$false,
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[12,13]),
[iquote('1:MRR:12.0,13.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SYN980+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.35 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 13:38:17 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.20/0.44 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.44 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.44 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.44 SPASS derived 6 clauses, backtracked 4 clauses, performed 1 splits and kept 14 clauses.
% 0.20/0.44 SPASS allocated 97554 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.44 SPASS spent 0:00:00.08 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.44 0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.20/0.44 0:00:00.02 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.44 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.44 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.44 0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44 Here is a proof with depth 3, length 13 :
% 0.20/0.44 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.44 Formulae used in the proof : prove_this
% 0.20/0.44
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------