TSTP Solution File: SYN980+1 by ConnectPP---0.3.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.3.0
% Problem  : SYN980+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : connect++ --verbosity 0 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Mar 25 14:43:53 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.34s
% Output   : Proof 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SYN980+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : connect++ --verbosity 0 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Mar 20 22:52:42 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.34  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  % Formula: prove_this ( conjecture ) (definitionally) converted to clauses:
% 0.12/0.34  cnf(prove_this-1, negated_conjecture, ( ~_def0(_u0) | p(f(_u0), _u0) )).
% 0.12/0.34  cnf(prove_this-2, negated_conjecture, ( ~p(_u2, _u1) | ~_def1(_u1, _u2) )).
% 0.12/0.34  cnf(prove_this-3, negated_conjecture, ( _def0(_u0) | r(skolem1) )).
% 0.12/0.34  cnf(prove_this-4, negated_conjecture, ( _def0(_u0) | ~r(_u0) )).
% 0.12/0.34  cnf(prove_this-5, negated_conjecture, ( _def1(_u1, _u2) | q(f(skolem1), skolem1) )).
% 0.12/0.34  cnf(prove_this-6, negated_conjecture, ( _def1(_u1, _u2) | ~q(_u2, _u1) )).
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  % Problem matrix:
% 0.12/0.34  cnf(matrix-0, plain, ( ~_def0(_u0) | p(f(_u0), _u0) )).
% 0.12/0.34  cnf(matrix-1, plain, ( ~p(_u2, _u1) | ~_def1(_u1, _u2) )).
% 0.12/0.34  cnf(matrix-2, plain, ( _def0(_u0) | r(skolem1) )).
% 0.12/0.34  cnf(matrix-3, plain, ( _def0(_u0) | ~r(_u0) )).
% 0.12/0.34  cnf(matrix-4, plain, ( _def1(_u1, _u2) | q(f(skolem1), skolem1) )).
% 0.12/0.34  cnf(matrix-5, plain, ( _def1(_u1, _u2) | ~q(_u2, _u1) )).
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  % Proof stack:
% 0.12/0.34  cnf(proof-stack, plain, 
% 0.12/0.34  proof_stack(
% 0.12/0.34  start(1), 
% 0.12/0.34  left_branch(0, 0, 1, 2), 
% 0.12/0.34  left_branch(0, 3, 0, 3), 
% 0.12/0.34  left_branch(0, 2, 1, 4), 
% 0.12/0.34  reduction(0, 1), 
% 0.12/0.34  right_branch(4), 
% 0.12/0.34  right_branch(3), 
% 0.12/0.34  right_branch(2), 
% 0.12/0.34  left_branch(0, 5, 0, 3), 
% 0.12/0.34  left_branch(0, 4, 1, 4), 
% 0.12/0.34  reduction(0, 0), 
% 0.12/0.34  right_branch(4), 
% 0.12/0.34  right_branch(3)
% 0.12/0.34  )).
% 0.12/0.34  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------