TSTP Solution File: SYN980+1 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : SYN980+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 01:48:14 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.55s 0.61s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem    : SYN980+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Sat Aug 26 17:18:20 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.56  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.60  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 0.53/0.60  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.60  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.53/0.60  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.53/0.60  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.53/0.60  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.53/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.61  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.61  % File     : SYN980+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.53/0.61  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.53/0.61  % Problem  : Syntactic from Shults
% 0.53/0.61  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.53/0.61  % English  :
% 0.53/0.61  
% 0.53/0.61  % Refs     : [Shu04] Shults (2004), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.53/0.61  % Source   : [Shu04]
% 0.53/0.61  % Names    :
% 0.53/0.61  
% 0.53/0.61  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.55/0.61  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.3.0, 0.08 v6.2.0, 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.04 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0, 0.07 v5.0.0, 0.10 v4.1.0, 0.11 v4.0.0, 0.10 v3.7.0, 0.00 v3.1.0
% 0.55/0.61  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    1 (   0 unt;   0 def)
% 0.55/0.61  %            Number of atoms       :    6 (   0 equ)
% 0.55/0.61  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   6 avg)
% 0.55/0.61  %            Number of connectives :    5 (   0   ~;   0   |;   1   &)
% 0.55/0.61  %                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.55/0.61  %            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   7 avg)
% 0.55/0.61  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.55/0.61  %            Number of predicates  :    3 (   3 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.55/0.61  %            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   0 con; 1-1 aty)
% 0.55/0.61  %            Number of variables   :    4 (   2   !;   2   ?)
% 0.55/0.61  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.55/0.61  
% 0.55/0.61  % Comments :
% 0.55/0.61  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.61  fof(prove_this,conjecture,
% 0.55/0.61      ! [B] :
% 0.55/0.61        ( ! [Y] :
% 0.55/0.61            ( ( r(B)
% 0.55/0.61             => r(Y) )
% 0.55/0.61           => p(f(Y),Y) )
% 0.55/0.61       => ? [X,Y] :
% 0.55/0.61            ( p(X,Y)
% 0.55/0.61            & ( q(f(B),B)
% 0.55/0.61             => q(X,Y) ) ) ) ).
% 0.55/0.61  
% 0.55/0.61  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.61  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.61  % Proof found
% 0.55/0.61  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.55/0.61  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.55/0.61  %ClaNum:4(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.55/0.61  %VarNum:11(SingletonVarNum:6)
% 0.55/0.61  %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.55/0.61  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.55/0.61  %SharedTerms:4
% 0.55/0.61  %goalClause: 1 2 3 4
% 0.55/0.61  [1]P2(f2(x11),x11)+P1(a1)
% 0.55/0.61  [2]~P1(x21)+P2(f2(x21),x21)
% 0.55/0.61  [4]~P3(x41,x42)+~P2(x41,x42)
% 0.55/0.61  [3]~P2(x31,x32)+P3(f2(a1),a1)
% 0.55/0.61  %EqnAxiom
% 0.55/0.61  
% 0.55/0.61  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.61  cnf(8,plain,
% 0.55/0.61     (P2(f2(a1),a1)+P2(f2(x81),x81)),
% 0.55/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2])).
% 0.55/0.61  cnf(9,plain,
% 0.55/0.61     (P3(f2(a1),a1)),
% 0.55/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[8,3])).
% 0.55/0.61  cnf(14,plain,
% 0.55/0.61     ($false),
% 0.55/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[9,4,1,2]),
% 0.55/0.61     ['proof']).
% 0.55/0.61  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.55/0.61  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------