TSTP Solution File: SYN979+1 by SuperZenon---0.0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem : SYN979+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:47:39 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.11s 0.39s
% Output : Proof 0.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.11 % Problem : SYN979+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.09/0.11 % Command : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 01:03:34 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.39 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.11/0.39 (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 0.11/0.39 (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 0.11/0.39 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.11/0.39 1. (s T_0) (-. (s T_0)) ### Axiom
% 0.11/0.39 2. (-. (p T_0 T_1)) (p T_0 T_1) ### Axiom
% 0.11/0.39 3. ((s T_0) => (p T_0 T_1)) (-. (p T_0 T_1)) (s T_0) ### Imply 1 2
% 0.11/0.39 4. (-. ((((q T_0) => (p T_0 T_0)) /\ ((q T_0) /\ ((q T_1) /\ (((r T_1) => (p T_1 T_1)) /\ ((r T_0) /\ ((r T_1) /\ (((s T_0) => (p T_0 T_1)) /\ (s T_0)))))))) => (p T_0 T_1))) (s T_0) (-. (p T_0 T_1)) ### ConjTree 3
% 0.11/0.39 5. (-. (Ex Y, ((((q T_0) => (p T_0 T_0)) /\ ((q T_0) /\ ((q T_1) /\ (((r Y) => (p T_1 Y)) /\ ((r T_0) /\ ((r T_1) /\ (((s T_0) => (p T_0 Y)) /\ (s T_0)))))))) => (p T_0 T_1)))) (-. (p T_0 T_1)) (s T_0) ### NotExists 4
% 0.11/0.39 6. (-. (Ex X, (Ex Y, ((((q X) => (p X T_0)) /\ ((q T_0) /\ ((q T_1) /\ (((r Y) => (p T_1 Y)) /\ ((r T_0) /\ ((r T_1) /\ (((s T_0) => (p X Y)) /\ (s T_0)))))))) => (p T_0 T_1))))) (s T_0) (-. (p T_0 T_1)) ### NotExists 5
% 0.11/0.39 7. (-. ((((q zenon_X2) => (p zenon_X2 T_0)) /\ ((q T_0) /\ ((q T_1) /\ (((r zenon_X3) => (p T_1 zenon_X3)) /\ ((r T_0) /\ ((r T_1) /\ (((s T_0) => (p zenon_X2 zenon_X3)) /\ (s T_0)))))))) => (p T_0 T_1))) (-. (Ex X, (Ex Y, ((((q X) => (p X T_0)) /\ ((q T_0) /\ ((q T_1) /\ (((r Y) => (p T_1 Y)) /\ ((r T_0) /\ ((r T_1) /\ (((s T_0) => (p X Y)) /\ (s T_0)))))))) => (p T_0 T_1))))) ### ConjTree 6
% 0.11/0.39 8. (-. (Ex Y, ((((q zenon_X2) => (p zenon_X2 T_0)) /\ ((q T_0) /\ ((q T_1) /\ (((r Y) => (p T_1 Y)) /\ ((r T_0) /\ ((r T_1) /\ (((s T_0) => (p zenon_X2 Y)) /\ (s T_0)))))))) => (p T_0 T_1)))) (-. (Ex X, (Ex Y, ((((q X) => (p X T_0)) /\ ((q T_0) /\ ((q T_1) /\ (((r Y) => (p T_1 Y)) /\ ((r T_0) /\ ((r T_1) /\ (((s T_0) => (p X Y)) /\ (s T_0)))))))) => (p T_0 T_1))))) ### NotExists 7
% 0.11/0.39 9. (-. (Ex X, (Ex Y, ((((q X) => (p X T_0)) /\ ((q T_0) /\ ((q T_1) /\ (((r Y) => (p T_1 Y)) /\ ((r T_0) /\ ((r T_1) /\ (((s T_0) => (p X Y)) /\ (s T_0)))))))) => (p T_0 T_1))))) ### NotExists 8
% 0.11/0.39 10. (-. (All B, (Ex X, (Ex Y, ((((q X) => (p X T_0)) /\ ((q T_0) /\ ((q B) /\ (((r Y) => (p B Y)) /\ ((r T_0) /\ ((r B) /\ (((s T_0) => (p X Y)) /\ (s T_0)))))))) => (p T_0 B)))))) ### NotAllEx 9
% 0.11/0.39 11. (-. (All A, (All B, (Ex X, (Ex Y, ((((q X) => (p X A)) /\ ((q A) /\ ((q B) /\ (((r Y) => (p B Y)) /\ ((r A) /\ ((r B) /\ (((s A) => (p X Y)) /\ (s A)))))))) => (p A B))))))) ### NotAllEx 10
% 0.11/0.39 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.11/0.39 (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------