%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SYN979+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 04:58:36 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 4.55s 2.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    8 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   10 (   0 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(X1,X2)
    | ~ s(esk1_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ko6033ou/lgb.p',i_0_3) ).

cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    s(esk1_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ko6033ou/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).

cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ko6033ou/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(X1,X2)
    | ~ s(esk1_0) ),
    i_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    s(esk1_0),
    i_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    p(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SYN979+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 01:35:46 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 4.55/2.28  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 4.55/2.28  # No SInE strategy applied
% 4.55/2.28  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 4.55/2.28  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c
% 4.55/2.28  # and selection function SelectCQPrecWNTNp.
% 4.55/2.28  #
% 4.55/2.28  # Preprocessing time       : 0.012 s
% 4.55/2.28  
% 4.55/2.28  # Proof found!
% 4.55/2.28  # SZS status Theorem
% 4.55/2.28  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.55/2.28  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.55/2.28  
% 4.55/2.28  # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.55/2.28  # User time                : 0.012 s
% 4.55/2.28  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 4.55/2.28  # Total time               : 0.017 s
% 4.55/2.28  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 4.55/2.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------