TSTP Solution File: SYN979+1 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : SYN979+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 02:00:26 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.58s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 4 unt; 6 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 42 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 12 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 41 ( 7 ~; 4 |; 22 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 5 ( 4 >; 1 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 4 sgn; 6 !; 4 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
q: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_23,type,
p: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_24,type,
r: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_25,type,
s: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_26,type,
esk1_0: $i ).
tff(decl_27,type,
esk2_0: $i ).
fof(prove_this,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] :
? [X3,X4] :
( ( ( q(X3)
=> p(X3,X1) )
& q(X1)
& q(X2)
& ( r(X4)
=> p(X2,X4) )
& r(X1)
& r(X2)
& ( s(X1)
=> p(X3,X4) )
& s(X1) )
=> p(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] :
? [X3,X4] :
( ( ( q(X3)
=> p(X3,X1) )
& q(X1)
& q(X2)
& ( r(X4)
=> p(X2,X4) )
& r(X1)
& r(X2)
& ( s(X1)
=> p(X3,X4) )
& s(X1) )
=> p(X1,X2) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_this]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X7,X8] :
( ( ~ q(X7)
| p(X7,esk1_0) )
& q(esk1_0)
& q(esk2_0)
& ( ~ r(X8)
| p(esk2_0,X8) )
& r(esk1_0)
& r(esk2_0)
& ( ~ s(esk1_0)
| p(X7,X8) )
& s(esk1_0)
& ~ p(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( p(X1,X2)
| ~ s(esk1_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
s(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ p(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
p(X1,X2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : SYN979+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 20:21:23 EDT 2023
% 0.19/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.57 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.58 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.19/0.58 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.58 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.58 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.58 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.58 % Total time : 0.004000 s
% 0.19/0.58 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.58 % Total time : 0.006000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------