TSTP Solution File: SYN976+1 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : SYN976+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 03:29:26 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 2.98s 1.17s
% Output   : Proof 3.41s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SYN976+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 19:15:48 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.67  ________       _____
% 0.20/0.67  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.20/0.67  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.20/0.67  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.20/0.67  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.20/0.67  
% 0.20/0.67  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.20/0.67  (2023-06-19)
% 0.20/0.67  
% 0.20/0.67  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.20/0.67  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.20/0.67                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.20/0.67  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.20/0.67  
% 0.20/0.67  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.20/0.67  
% 0.20/0.67  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.20/0.68  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.20/0.70  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.20/0.70  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.20/0.70  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.20/0.70  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.20/0.70  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.20/0.70  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.20/0.71  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 2.04/0.99  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.04/0.99  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.04/1.04  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.04/1.04  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.04/1.04  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.04/1.04  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.04/1.04  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.49/1.09  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 2.49/1.09  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 2.49/1.09  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.49/1.09  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.49/1.09  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 2.49/1.09  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 2.49/1.09  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.98/1.17  Prover 0: proved (479ms)
% 2.98/1.17  
% 2.98/1.17  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.98/1.17  
% 2.98/1.17  Prover 3: proved (476ms)
% 2.98/1.17  
% 2.98/1.17  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.98/1.17  
% 2.98/1.17  Prover 4: Found proof (size 5)
% 2.98/1.17  Prover 1: Found proof (size 5)
% 2.98/1.17  Prover 4: proved (471ms)
% 2.98/1.17  Prover 1: proved (482ms)
% 2.98/1.17  Prover 5: stopped
% 2.98/1.17  Prover 6: stopped
% 2.98/1.17  Prover 2: stopped
% 2.98/1.17  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 2.98/1.17  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 2.98/1.18  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 2.98/1.18  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 2.98/1.19  Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 2.98/1.19  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.98/1.19  Prover 7: stopped
% 2.98/1.20  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 2.98/1.20  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.98/1.20  Prover 8: stopped
% 2.98/1.20  
% 2.98/1.20  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.98/1.20  
% 2.98/1.21  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 2.98/1.21  Assumptions after simplification:
% 2.98/1.21  ---------------------------------
% 2.98/1.21  
% 2.98/1.21    (prove_this)
% 3.41/1.25     ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & q(v0) = v1 & $i(v0) &  ! [v2: $i]
% 3.41/1.25      :  ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (q(v2) = v3) |  ~ $i(v2)) &  ! [v2: $i] :  !
% 3.41/1.25      [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (p(v2) = v3) |  ~ $i(v2)) & (g | f))
% 3.41/1.25  
% 3.41/1.25  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 3.41/1.25  ---------------------------------
% 3.41/1.25  
% 3.41/1.25  Begin of proof
% 3.41/1.25  | 
% 3.41/1.26  | DELTA: instantiating (prove_this) with fresh symbols all_3_0, all_3_1 gives:
% 3.41/1.26  |   (1)   ~ (all_3_0 = 0) & q(all_3_1) = all_3_0 & $i(all_3_1) &  ! [v0: $i] : 
% 3.41/1.26  |        ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (q(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 3.41/1.26  |        [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (p(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0)) & (g | f)
% 3.41/1.26  | 
% 3.41/1.26  | ALPHA: (1) implies:
% 3.41/1.26  |   (2)   ~ (all_3_0 = 0)
% 3.41/1.26  |   (3)  $i(all_3_1)
% 3.41/1.26  |   (4)  q(all_3_1) = all_3_0
% 3.41/1.26  |   (5)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (q(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0))
% 3.41/1.26  | 
% 3.41/1.26  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_3_1, all_3_0, simplifying with (3),
% 3.41/1.26  |              (4) gives:
% 3.41/1.26  |   (6)  all_3_0 = 0
% 3.41/1.26  | 
% 3.41/1.26  | REDUCE: (2), (6) imply:
% 3.41/1.26  |   (7)  $false
% 3.41/1.27  | 
% 3.41/1.27  | CLOSE: (7) is inconsistent.
% 3.41/1.27  | 
% 3.41/1.27  End of proof
% 3.41/1.27  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 3.41/1.27  
% 3.41/1.27  593ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------