%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Goeland---1.0.0
% Problem  : SYN976+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 29 22:25:10 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.35s
% Output   : Proof 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SYN976+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command    : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon Sep  5 09:51:01 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.34  [DMT] DMT loaded with preskolemization
% 0.19/0.34  [EQ] equality loaded.
% 0.19/0.34  [0.000037s][1][MAIN] Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.34  Start search
% 0.19/0.34  nb_step : 1 - limit : 2
% 0.19/0.34  Launch Gotab with destructive = true
% 0.19/0.35  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.35  [0] DELTA_NOT_FORALL : ~! [A2_2] :  ((((f | g) & ! [X3_3] :  ((p(X3_3) & q(X3_3)))) => q(A2_2)))
% 0.19/0.35  	-> [1] ~(((f | g) & ! [X3_3] :  ((p(X3_3) & q(X3_3)))) => q(skolem_A22))
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  [1] ALPHA_NOT_IMPLY : ~(((f | g) & ! [X3_3] :  ((p(X3_3) & q(X3_3)))) => q(skolem_A22))
% 0.19/0.35  	-> [2] ((f | g) & ! [X3_3] :  ((p(X3_3) & q(X3_3)))), ~q(skolem_A22)
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  [2] ALPHA_AND : ((f | g) & ! [X3_3] :  ((p(X3_3) & q(X3_3))))
% 0.19/0.35  	-> [3] (f | g), ! [X3_3] :  ((p(X3_3) & q(X3_3)))
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  [3] BETA_OR : (f | g)
% 0.19/0.35  	-> [4] f
% 0.19/0.35  	-> [5] g
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  [5] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [X3_3] :  ((p(X3_3) & q(X3_3)))
% 0.19/0.35  	-> [7] (p(X3_1_0) & q(X3_1_0))
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  [7] ALPHA_AND : (p(X3_1_0) & q(X3_1_0))
% 0.19/0.35  	-> [9] p(X3_1_0), q(X3_1_0)
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  [9] CLOSURE : q(X3_1_0)
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  [4] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [X3_3] :  ((p(X3_3) & q(X3_3)))
% 0.19/0.35  	-> [6] (p(X3_0_0) & q(X3_0_0))
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  [6] ALPHA_AND : (p(X3_0_0) & q(X3_0_0))
% 0.19/0.35  	-> [8] p(X3_0_0), q(X3_0_0)
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  [8] CLOSURE : q(X3_0_0)
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.35  [0.004749s][1][Res] 3 goroutines created
% 0.19/0.35  ==== Result ====
% 0.19/0.35  [0.004781s][1][Res] VALID
% 0.19/0.35  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------