TSTP Solution File: SYN976+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SYN976+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 06:06:43 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.16s 1.33s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 6 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 18 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 15 ( 3 ~; 3 |; 7 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 3 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 2 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_this,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ( ( f
| g )
& ! [X2] :
( p(X2)
& q(X2) ) )
=> q(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',prove_this) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ( ( f
| g )
& ! [X2] :
( p(X2)
& q(X2) ) )
=> q(X1) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_this]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X4,X4] :
( ( f
| g )
& p(X4)
& q(X4)
& ~ q(esk1_0) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ q(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
q(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.08 % Problem : SYN976+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.09 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.09/0.28 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.28 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.28 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.28 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.28 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.28 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.28 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.09/0.28 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 20:50:07 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.28 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/1.33 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.16/1.33 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.16/1.33 # Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% 0.16/1.33
% 0.16/1.33 # Proof found!
% 0.16/1.33 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.16/1.33 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/1.33 # Proof object total steps : 6
% 0.16/1.33 # Proof object clause steps : 3
% 0.16/1.33 # Proof object formula steps : 3
% 0.16/1.33 # Proof object conjectures : 6
% 0.16/1.33 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 0.16/1.33 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.16/1.33 # Proof object initial clauses used : 2
% 0.16/1.33 # Proof object initial formulas used : 1
% 0.16/1.33 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 0.16/1.33 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 0.16/1.33 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.16/1.33 # Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.16/1.33 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.16/1.33 # Initial clauses : 4
% 0.16/1.33 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.16/1.33 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2
% 0.16/1.33 # Processed clauses : 1
% 0.16/1.33 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.16/1.33 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.16/1.34 # ...remaining for further processing : 0
% 0.16/1.34 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.16/1.34 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/1.34 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.16/1.34 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.16/1.34 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.16/1.34 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.16/1.34 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/1.34 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.16/1.34 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/1.34 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.16/1.34 # Current number of processed clauses : 0
% 0.16/1.34 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.16/1.34 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/1.34 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.16/1.34 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.16/1.34 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.16/1.34 # ...number of literals in the above : 2
% 0.16/1.34 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/1.34 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.16/1.34 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.16/1.34 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.16/1.34 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.16/1.34 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.16/1.34 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/1.34 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.16/1.34 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.16/1.34 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/1.34 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/1.34 # Termbank termtop insertions : 142
% 0.16/1.34
% 0.16/1.34 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/1.34 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.16/1.34 # System time : 0.000 s
% 0.16/1.34 # Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.16/1.34 # Maximum resident set size: 2500 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------