TSTP Solution File: SYN972+1 by SnakeForV---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem : SYN972+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 19:36:14 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.51s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 17 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 14 ( 7 ~; 0 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 26 ( 16 !; 10 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f10,plain,
$false,
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f8,f9]) ).
fof(f9,plain,
! [X1] : p(sK0,X1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).
fof(f7,plain,
( ! [X1] : p(sK0,X1)
& ! [X3] : ~ p(X3,sK1) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f4,f6,f5]) ).
fof(f5,plain,
( ? [X0] :
! [X1] : p(X0,X1)
=> ! [X1] : p(sK0,X1) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f6,plain,
( ? [X2] :
! [X3] : ~ p(X3,X2)
=> ! [X3] : ~ p(X3,sK1) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f4,plain,
( ? [X0] :
! [X1] : p(X0,X1)
& ? [X2] :
! [X3] : ~ p(X3,X2) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
fof(f3,plain,
~ ( ? [X0] :
! [X1] : p(X0,X1)
=> ! [X2] :
? [X3] : p(X3,X2) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ? [X0] :
! [X1] : p(X0,X1)
=> ! [X1] :
? [X0] : p(X0,X1) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f1,conjecture,
( ? [X0] :
! [X1] : p(X0,X1)
=> ! [X1] :
? [X0] : p(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
fof(f8,plain,
! [X3] : ~ p(X3,sK1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN972+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 22:45:44 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.49 % (2200)lrs+10_1:32_br=off:nm=16:sd=2:ss=axioms:st=2.0:urr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.19/0.50 % (2217)lrs-11_1:1_nm=0:sac=on:sd=4:ss=axioms:st=3.0:i=24:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/24Mi)
% 0.19/0.51 % (2188)lrs+10_1:1_gsp=on:sd=1:sgt=32:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=13:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/13Mi)
% 0.19/0.51 % (2209)ott+21_1:1_erd=off:s2a=on:sac=on:sd=1:sgt=64:sos=on:ss=included:st=3.0:to=lpo:urr=on:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 0.19/0.51 % (2200)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.51 % (2200)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.51 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.51 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.51 % (2200)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51 % (2200)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.51 % (2200)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.51 % (2200)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51 % (2200)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 0.19/0.51 % (2200)Time elapsed: 0.103 s
% 0.19/0.51 % (2200)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.19/0.51 % (2200)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51 % (2200)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51 % (2186)Success in time 0.159 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------