TSTP Solution File: SYN972+1 by Otter---3.3
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Otter---3.3
% Problem : SYN972+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : otter-tptp-script %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:25:35 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.68s 1.89s
% Output : Refutation 1.68s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 1
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 3 ( 3 unt; 0 nHn; 2 RR)
% Number of literals : 3 ( 0 equ; 1 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
~ p(A,dollar_c2),
file('SYN972+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(2,axiom,
p(dollar_c1,A),
file('SYN972+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(3,plain,
$false,
inference(binary,[status(thm)],[2,1]),
[iquote('binary,2.1,1.1')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYN972+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 11:13:34 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 -------- PROOF --------
% 1.68/1.89 ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.68/1.89 The process was started by sandbox on n028.cluster.edu,
% 1.68/1.89 Wed Jul 27 11:13:34 2022
% 1.68/1.89 The command was "./otter". The process ID is 11197.
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.68/1.89 set(auto).
% 1.68/1.89 dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.68/1.89 dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.68/1.89 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.68/1.89 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.68/1.89 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.68/1.89 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.68/1.89 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.68/1.89 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.68/1.89 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.68/1.89 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.68/1.89 dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.68/1.89 clear(print_given).
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 formula_list(usable).
% 1.68/1.89 -((exists X all Y p(X,Y))-> (all Y exists X p(X,Y))).
% 1.68/1.89 end_of_list.
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 -------> usable clausifies to:
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 list(usable).
% 1.68/1.89 0 [] p($c1,Y).
% 1.68/1.89 0 [] -p(X,$c2).
% 1.68/1.89 end_of_list.
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=1.
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 1.68/1.89 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 1.68/1.89 in usable.
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.68/1.89 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 ------------> process usable:
% 1.68/1.89 ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 1 [] -p(A,$c2).
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 ------------> process sos:
% 1.68/1.89 ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 2 [] p($c1,A).
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.00 sec ----> 3 [binary,2.1,1.1] $F.
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 Length of proof is 0. Level of proof is 0.
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.68/1.89 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.68/1.89 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.68/1.89 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 ============ end of search ============
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.68/1.89 clauses given 0
% 1.68/1.89 clauses generated 0
% 1.68/1.89 clauses kept 2
% 1.68/1.89 clauses forward subsumed 0
% 1.68/1.89 clauses back subsumed 0
% 1.68/1.89 Kbytes malloced 976
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.68/1.89 user CPU time 0.00 (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.68/1.89 system CPU time 0.00 (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.68/1.89 wall-clock time 1 (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 Process 11197 finished Wed Jul 27 11:13:35 2022
% 1.68/1.89 Otter interrupted
% 1.68/1.89 PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------