TSTP Solution File: SYN969+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : SYN969+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 19:46:13 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 0.50s
% Output   : Refutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   57 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   67 (  24   ~;  14   |;  20   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (  20   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f14,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[],[f13,f8]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    r(sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ( ! [X1] :
        ( ~ r(X1)
        | p(X1) )
    & ! [X2] :
        ( q(X2)
        | ~ p(X2) )
    & ~ q(sK0)
    & r(sK0) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f5,f6]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( ! [X1] :
            ( ~ r(X1)
            | p(X1) )
        & ! [X2] :
            ( q(X2)
            | ~ p(X2) )
        & ~ q(X0)
        & r(X0) )
   => ( ! [X1] :
          ( ~ r(X1)
          | p(X1) )
      & ! [X2] :
          ( q(X2)
          | ~ p(X2) )
      & ~ q(sK0)
      & r(sK0) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( ~ r(X1)
          | p(X1) )
      & ! [X2] :
          ( q(X2)
          | ~ p(X2) )
      & ~ q(X0)
      & r(X0) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ! [X2] :
          ( ~ r(X2)
          | p(X2) )
      & ! [X1] :
          ( q(X1)
          | ~ p(X1) )
      & ~ q(X0)
      & r(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ~ q(X0)
      & ! [X2] :
          ( ~ r(X2)
          | p(X2) )
      & r(X0)
      & ! [X1] :
          ( q(X1)
          | ~ p(X1) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ( r(X0)
          & ! [X1] :
              ( p(X1)
             => q(X1) ) )
       => ( ! [X2] :
              ( r(X2)
             => p(X2) )
         => q(X0) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( r(X0)
        & ! [X1] :
            ( p(X1)
           => q(X1) ) )
     => ( ! [X2] :
            ( r(X2)
           => p(X2) )
       => q(X0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ~ r(sK0),
    inference(resolution,[],[f11,f12]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ~ p(sK0),
    inference(resolution,[],[f10,f9]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ~ q(sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( q(X2)
      | ~ p(X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( p(X1)
      | ~ r(X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.14  % Problem    : SYN969+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.04/0.15  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 22:43:12 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.23/0.48  % (6984)ott-1_1:6_av=off:cond=on:fsr=off:nwc=3.0:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/51Mi)
% 0.23/0.49  % (7000)ott+10_1:5_bd=off:tgt=full:i=500:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/500Mi)
% 0.23/0.49  % (6984)First to succeed.
% 0.23/0.50  % (6984)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.23/0.50  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.23/0.50  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.50  % (6984)------------------------------
% 0.23/0.50  % (6984)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.23/0.50  % (6984)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.23/0.50  % (6984)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.23/0.50  
% 0.23/0.50  % (6984)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.23/0.50  % (6984)Time elapsed: 0.061 s
% 0.23/0.50  % (6984)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.23/0.50  % (6984)------------------------------
% 0.23/0.50  % (6984)------------------------------
% 0.23/0.50  % (6973)Success in time 0.121 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------