%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SYN967+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 04:58:31 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.59s 2.36s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    8 (   2 unt;   2 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   14 (   0 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    5 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( q(X1)
    | p(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_a6kcbkg/input.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(i_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(X1)
    | ~ q(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_a6kcbkg/input.p',i_0_5) ).

cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p(esk1_0)
    | ~ p(esk2_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_a6kcbkg/input.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( q(X1)
    | p(X1) ),
    i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(X1)
    | ~ q(X1) ),
    i_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p(esk1_0)
    | ~ p(esk2_0) ),
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    p(X1),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_12])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : SYN967+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 09:23:22 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.59/2.36  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 7.59/2.36  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.59/2.36  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.59/2.36  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___200_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y
% 7.59/2.36  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 7.59/2.36  #
% 7.59/2.36  # Preprocessing time       : 0.022 s
% 7.59/2.36  
% 7.59/2.36  # Proof found!
% 7.59/2.36  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.59/2.36  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.59/2.36  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.59/2.36  
% 7.59/2.36  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.59/2.36  # User time                : 0.021 s
% 7.59/2.36  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 7.59/2.36  # Total time               : 0.026 s
% 7.59/2.36  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.59/2.36  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------