TSTP Solution File: SYN967+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SYN967+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 06:06:39 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 1.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 8 ( 2 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 30 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 31 ( 9 ~; 8 |; 6 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 1 sgn 8 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_this,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] :
( ! [X3] :
( q(X3)
=> p(X3) )
=> ? [X4] :
( ( p(X4)
=> p(X1) )
& ( q(X4)
=> p(X2) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',prove_this) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] :
( ! [X3] :
( q(X3)
=> p(X3) )
=> ? [X4] :
( ( p(X4)
=> p(X1) )
& ( q(X4)
=> p(X2) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_this]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X7,X8] :
( ( ~ q(X7)
| p(X7) )
& ( q(X8)
| p(X8) )
& ( ~ p(esk2_0)
| p(X8) )
& ( q(X8)
| ~ p(esk1_0) )
& ( ~ p(esk2_0)
| ~ p(esk1_0) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( p(X1)
| ~ q(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( p(X1)
| q(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(esk1_0)
| ~ p(esk2_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
p(X1),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SYN967+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 09:11:27 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/1.43 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.24/1.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 0.24/1.43
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.43 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object total steps : 8
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object clause steps : 5
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object formula steps : 3
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object conjectures : 8
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object clause conjectures : 5
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object initial clauses used : 3
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object initial formulas used : 1
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 4
% 0.24/1.43 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.43 # Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.24/1.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Initial clauses : 5
% 0.24/1.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 5
% 0.24/1.43 # Processed clauses : 5
% 0.24/1.43 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 5
% 0.24/1.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Backward-rewritten : 4
% 0.24/1.43 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1
% 0.24/1.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.24/1.43 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 1
% 0.24/1.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.24/1.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.24/1.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 1
% 0.24/1.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.24/1.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.24/1.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.24/1.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.24/1.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.24/1.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.24/1.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 253
% 0.24/1.43
% 0.24/1.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.43 # User time : 0.011 s
% 0.24/1.43 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.24/1.43 # Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.24/1.43 # Maximum resident set size: 2760 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------