TSTP Solution File: SYN965+1 by SuperZenon---0.0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem  : SYN965+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:47:33 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.41s
% Output   : Proof 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SYN965+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 18:25:12 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.41  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.41  (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 0.19/0.41  (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 0.19/0.41  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.41  1. (p T_0 T_0) (-. (p T_0 T_0))   ### Axiom
% 0.19/0.41  2. (-. (Ex W, (p W T_0))) (p T_0 T_0)   ### NotExists 1
% 0.19/0.41  3. (-. ((p T_0 T_0) => (Ex W, (p W T_0))))   ### NotImply 2
% 0.19/0.41  4. (p zenon_X1 T_0) (-. (p zenon_X1 T_0))   ### Axiom
% 0.19/0.41  5. (-. (Ex W, (p W T_0))) (p zenon_X1 T_0)   ### NotExists 4
% 0.19/0.41  6. (-. ((p T_0 T_2) => (Ex W, (p W T_0)))) (p zenon_X1 T_0)   ### NotImply 5
% 0.19/0.41  7. (-. (p T_0 T_0)) (p T_0 T_0)   ### Axiom
% 0.19/0.41  8. (-. (((p T_0 T_0) /\ (p T_0 T_0)) => (p T_0 T_2))) (-. (p T_0 T_0))   ### ConjTree 7
% 0.19/0.41  9. (-. (((p T_0 T_2) => (Ex W, (p W T_0))) /\ (((p T_0 T_0) /\ (p T_0 T_0)) => (p T_0 T_2)))) (-. (p T_0 T_0)) (p zenon_X1 T_0)   ### NotAnd 6 8
% 0.19/0.41  10. (-. (Ex Y, (((p Y T_2) => (Ex W, (p W Y))) /\ (((p T_0 Y) /\ (p Y T_0)) => (p Y T_2))))) (p zenon_X1 T_0) (-. (p T_0 T_0))   ### NotExists 9
% 0.19/0.41  11. (-. (All X, (Ex Y, (((p Y X) => (Ex W, (p W Y))) /\ (((p T_0 Y) /\ (p Y T_0)) => (p Y X)))))) (-. (p T_0 T_0)) (p zenon_X1 T_0)   ### NotAllEx 10
% 0.19/0.41  12. (-. (Ex Z, (All X, (Ex Y, (((p Y X) => (Ex W, (p W Y))) /\ (((p Z Y) /\ (p Y Z)) => (p Y X))))))) (p zenon_X1 T_0) (-. (p T_0 T_0))   ### NotExists 11
% 0.19/0.41  13. (-. (((p zenon_X1 T_0) /\ (p T_0 zenon_X1)) => (p T_0 T_0))) (-. (Ex Z, (All X, (Ex Y, (((p Y X) => (Ex W, (p W Y))) /\ (((p Z Y) /\ (p Y Z)) => (p Y X)))))))   ### ConjTree 12
% 0.19/0.41  14. (-. (((p T_0 T_0) => (Ex W, (p W T_0))) /\ (((p zenon_X1 T_0) /\ (p T_0 zenon_X1)) => (p T_0 T_0)))) (-. (Ex Z, (All X, (Ex Y, (((p Y X) => (Ex W, (p W Y))) /\ (((p Z Y) /\ (p Y Z)) => (p Y X)))))))   ### NotAnd 3 13
% 0.19/0.41  15. (-. (Ex Y, (((p Y T_0) => (Ex W, (p W Y))) /\ (((p zenon_X1 Y) /\ (p Y zenon_X1)) => (p Y T_0))))) (-. (Ex Z, (All X, (Ex Y, (((p Y X) => (Ex W, (p W Y))) /\ (((p Z Y) /\ (p Y Z)) => (p Y X)))))))   ### NotExists 14
% 0.19/0.41  16. (-. (All X, (Ex Y, (((p Y X) => (Ex W, (p W Y))) /\ (((p zenon_X1 Y) /\ (p Y zenon_X1)) => (p Y X)))))) (-. (Ex Z, (All X, (Ex Y, (((p Y X) => (Ex W, (p W Y))) /\ (((p Z Y) /\ (p Y Z)) => (p Y X)))))))   ### NotAllEx 15
% 0.19/0.41  17. (-. (Ex Z, (All X, (Ex Y, (((p Y X) => (Ex W, (p W Y))) /\ (((p Z Y) /\ (p Y Z)) => (p Y X)))))))   ### NotExists 16
% 0.19/0.41  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.41  (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------