TSTP Solution File: SYN964+1 by Z3---4.8.9.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Z3---4.8.9.0
% Problem : SYN964+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 30 00:01:25 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.38s
% Output : Proof 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYN964+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Sep 5 09:47:10 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 Z3tptp [4.8.9.0] (c) 2006-20**. Microsoft Corp.
% 0.12/0.34 Usage: tptp [options] [-file:]file
% 0.12/0.34 -h, -? prints this message.
% 0.12/0.34 -smt2 print SMT-LIB2 benchmark.
% 0.12/0.34 -m, -model generate model.
% 0.12/0.34 -p, -proof generate proof.
% 0.12/0.34 -c, -core generate unsat core of named formulas.
% 0.12/0.34 -st, -statistics display statistics.
% 0.12/0.34 -t:timeout set timeout (in second).
% 0.12/0.34 -smt2status display status in smt2 format instead of SZS.
% 0.12/0.34 -check_status check the status produced by Z3 against annotation in benchmark.
% 0.12/0.34 -<param>:<value> configuration parameter and value.
% 0.12/0.34 -o:<output-file> file to place output in.
% 0.19/0.38 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.38 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.38 tff(p_type, type, (
% 0.19/0.38 p: $i > $o)).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(tptp_fun_X_0_type, type, (
% 0.19/0.38 tptp_fun_X_0: $i)).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(1,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 (^[Z: $i] : refl((~p(Z)) <=> (~p(Z)))),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(2,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 (![Z: $i] : (~p(Z)) <=> ![Z: $i] : (~p(Z))),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[1])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(3,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 ((~?[Z: $i] : p(Z)) <=> (~?[Z: $i] : p(Z))),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(4,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 ((~(?[X: $i] : p(X) => ?[Z: $i] : p(Z))) <=> (~((~?[X: $i] : p(X)) | ?[Z: $i] : p(Z)))),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(5,axiom,(~(?[X: $i] : p(X) => ?[Z: $i] : p(Z))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','prove_this')).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(6,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 (~((~?[X: $i] : p(X)) | ?[Z: $i] : p(Z))),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[5, 4])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(7,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 (~?[Z: $i] : p(Z)),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(or_elim,[status(thm)],[6])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(8,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 (~?[Z: $i] : p(Z)),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[7, 3])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(9,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 (~?[Z: $i] : p(Z)),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[8, 3])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(10,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 (~?[Z: $i] : p(Z)),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[9, 3])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(11,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 (~?[Z: $i] : p(Z)),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[10, 3])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(12,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 (~?[Z: $i] : p(Z)),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[11, 3])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(13,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 (~?[Z: $i] : p(Z)),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[12, 3])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(14,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 (^[Z: $i] : refl($oeq((~p(Z)), (~p(Z))))),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(15,plain,(
% 0.19/0.38 ![Z: $i] : (~p(Z))),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(nnf-neg,[status(sab)],[13, 14])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(16,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 (![Z: $i] : (~p(Z))),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[15, 2])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(17,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 (?[X: $i] : p(X) <=> ?[X: $i] : p(X)),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(18,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 (?[X: $i] : p(X)),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(or_elim,[status(thm)],[6])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(19,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 (?[X: $i] : p(X)),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[18, 17])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(20,plain,(
% 0.19/0.38 p(X!0)),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[19])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(21,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 ((~![Z: $i] : (~p(Z))) | (~p(X!0))),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(22,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 ($false),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[21, 20, 16])).
% 0.19/0.38 % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------