TSTP Solution File: SYN962+1 by Z3---4.8.9.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Z3---4.8.9.0
% Problem  : SYN962+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 30 00:01:25 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.40s
% Output   : Proof 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : SYN962+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Sep  5 09:06:56 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  Z3tptp [4.8.9.0] (c) 2006-20**. Microsoft Corp.
% 0.13/0.35  Usage: tptp [options] [-file:]file
% 0.13/0.35    -h, -?       prints this message.
% 0.13/0.35    -smt2        print SMT-LIB2 benchmark.
% 0.13/0.35    -m, -model   generate model.
% 0.13/0.35    -p, -proof   generate proof.
% 0.13/0.35    -c, -core    generate unsat core of named formulas.
% 0.13/0.35    -st, -statistics display statistics.
% 0.13/0.35    -t:timeout   set timeout (in second).
% 0.13/0.35    -smt2status  display status in smt2 format instead of SZS.
% 0.13/0.35    -check_status check the status produced by Z3 against annotation in benchmark.
% 0.13/0.35    -<param>:<value> configuration parameter and value.
% 0.13/0.35    -o:<output-file> file to place output in.
% 0.13/0.40  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.40  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.13/0.40  tff(p_type, type, (
% 0.13/0.40     p: $i > $o)).
% 0.13/0.40  tff(tptp_fun_Y_0_type, type, (
% 0.13/0.40     tptp_fun_Y_0: $i)).
% 0.13/0.40  tff(1,plain,
% 0.13/0.40      ((~![Y: $i] : p(Y)) <=> (~![Y: $i] : p(Y))),
% 0.13/0.40      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.13/0.40  tff(2,plain,
% 0.13/0.40      ((~(![X: $i] : p(X) & ![Y: $i] : p(Y))) <=> (~![Y: $i] : p(Y))),
% 0.13/0.40      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.13/0.40  tff(3,plain,
% 0.13/0.40      ((![X: $i] : p(X) & ![Y: $i] : p(Y)) <=> (![X: $i] : p(X) & ![Y: $i] : p(Y))),
% 0.13/0.40      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.13/0.40  tff(4,plain,
% 0.13/0.40      ((~(![X: $i] : p(X) & ![Y: $i] : p(Y))) <=> (~(![X: $i] : p(X) & ![Y: $i] : p(Y)))),
% 0.13/0.40      inference(monotonicity,[status(thm)],[3])).
% 0.13/0.40  tff(5,plain,
% 0.13/0.40      ((~(![X: $i] : p(X) => (![X: $i] : p(X) & ![Y: $i] : p(Y)))) <=> (~((~![X: $i] : p(X)) | (![X: $i] : p(X) & ![Y: $i] : p(Y))))),
% 0.13/0.40      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.13/0.40  tff(6,axiom,(~(![X: $i] : p(X) => (![X: $i] : p(X) & ![Y: $i] : p(Y)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','prove_this')).
% 0.13/0.40  tff(7,plain,
% 0.13/0.40      (~((~![X: $i] : p(X)) | (![X: $i] : p(X) & ![Y: $i] : p(Y)))),
% 0.13/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[6, 5])).
% 0.13/0.40  tff(8,plain,
% 0.13/0.40      (~(![X: $i] : p(X) & ![Y: $i] : p(Y))),
% 0.13/0.40      inference(or_elim,[status(thm)],[7])).
% 0.13/0.40  tff(9,plain,
% 0.13/0.40      (~(![X: $i] : p(X) & ![Y: $i] : p(Y))),
% 0.13/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[8, 4])).
% 0.13/0.40  tff(10,plain,
% 0.13/0.40      (~![Y: $i] : p(Y)),
% 0.13/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[9, 2])).
% 0.13/0.40  tff(11,plain,
% 0.13/0.40      (~![Y: $i] : p(Y)),
% 0.13/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[10, 1])).
% 0.13/0.40  tff(12,plain,
% 0.13/0.40      (~![Y: $i] : p(Y)),
% 0.13/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[11, 1])).
% 0.13/0.40  tff(13,plain,
% 0.13/0.40      (~![Y: $i] : p(Y)),
% 0.13/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[12, 1])).
% 0.13/0.40  tff(14,plain,
% 0.13/0.40      (~![Y: $i] : p(Y)),
% 0.13/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[13, 1])).
% 0.13/0.40  tff(15,plain,
% 0.13/0.40      (~![Y: $i] : p(Y)),
% 0.13/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[14, 1])).
% 0.13/0.40  tff(16,plain,(
% 0.13/0.40      ~p(Y!0)),
% 0.13/0.40      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[15])).
% 0.13/0.40  tff(17,plain,
% 0.13/0.40      (^[X: $i] : refl(p(X) <=> p(X))),
% 0.13/0.40      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.13/0.40  tff(18,plain,
% 0.13/0.40      (![X: $i] : p(X) <=> ![X: $i] : p(X)),
% 0.13/0.40      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[17])).
% 0.13/0.40  tff(19,plain,
% 0.13/0.40      (![X: $i] : p(X) <=> ![X: $i] : p(X)),
% 0.13/0.40      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.13/0.40  tff(20,plain,
% 0.13/0.40      (![X: $i] : p(X)),
% 0.13/0.40      inference(or_elim,[status(thm)],[7])).
% 0.13/0.40  tff(21,plain,
% 0.13/0.40      (![X: $i] : p(X)),
% 0.13/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[20, 19])).
% 0.13/0.40  tff(22,plain,(
% 0.13/0.40      ![X: $i] : p(X)),
% 0.13/0.40      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[21])).
% 0.13/0.40  tff(23,plain,
% 0.13/0.40      (![X: $i] : p(X)),
% 0.13/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[22, 18])).
% 0.13/0.40  tff(24,plain,
% 0.13/0.40      ((~![X: $i] : p(X)) | p(Y!0)),
% 0.13/0.40      inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.13/0.40  tff(25,plain,
% 0.13/0.40      ($false),
% 0.13/0.40      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[24, 23, 16])).
% 0.13/0.40  % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------