%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Goeland---1.0.0
% Problem  : SYN962+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 29 22:25:07 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.35s
% Output   : Proof 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : SYN962+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon Sep  5 09:44:58 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.34  [DMT] DMT loaded with preskolemization
% 0.13/0.34  [EQ] equality loaded.
% 0.13/0.34  [0.000039s][1][MAIN] Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.34  Start search
% 0.13/0.34  nb_step : 1 - limit : 3
% 0.13/0.34  Launch Gotab with destructive = true
% 0.13/0.35  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35  [0] ALPHA_NOT_IMPLY : ~(! [X2_2] :  (p(X2_2)) => (! [X3_3] :  (p(X3_3)) & ! [Y4_4] :  (p(Y4_4))))
% 0.13/0.35  	-> [1] ! [X2_2] :  (p(X2_2)), ~(! [X3_3] :  (p(X3_3)) & ! [Y4_4] :  (p(Y4_4)))
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  [1] BETA_NOT_AND : ~(! [X3_3] :  (p(X3_3)) & ! [Y4_4] :  (p(Y4_4)))
% 0.13/0.35  	-> [2] ~! [X3_3] :  (p(X3_3))
% 0.13/0.35  	-> [3] ~! [Y4_4] :  (p(Y4_4))
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  [3] DELTA_NOT_FORALL : ~! [Y4_4] :  (p(Y4_4))
% 0.13/0.35  	-> [4] ~p(skolem_Y44)
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  [4] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [X2_2] :  (p(X2_2))
% 0.13/0.35  	-> [7] p(X2_1_0)
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  [7] CLOSURE : p(X2_1_0)
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  [2] DELTA_NOT_FORALL : ~! [X3_3] :  (p(X3_3))
% 0.13/0.35  	-> [5] ~p(skolem_X33)
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  [5] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [X2_2] :  (p(X2_2))
% 0.13/0.35  	-> [6] p(X2_0_0)
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  [6] CLOSURE : p(X2_0_0)
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35  [0.003575s][1][Res] 3 goroutines created
% 0.13/0.35  ==== Result ====
% 0.13/0.35  [0.003608s][1][Res] VALID
% 0.13/0.35  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------