TSTP Solution File: SYN960+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : SYN960+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 19:46:12 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.16s 0.43s
% Output : Refutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 1 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 55 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 54 ( 23 ~; 19 |; 3 &)
% ( 6 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 1 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 4 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 48 ( 20 !; 28 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f29,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f15,f24,f26,f28]) ).
fof(f28,plain,
( ~ spl4_1
| ~ spl4_2 ),
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f27]) ).
fof(f27,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl4_1
| ~ spl4_2 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f19,f14]) ).
fof(f14,plain,
( ! [X0,X1] : ~ a(X0,X1)
| ~ spl4_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f13]) ).
fof(f13,plain,
( spl4_1
<=> ! [X0,X1] : ~ a(X0,X1) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_1])]) ).
fof(f19,plain,
( a(sK0,sK1)
| ~ spl4_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f17]) ).
fof(f17,plain,
( spl4_2
<=> a(sK0,sK1) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_2])]) ).
fof(f26,plain,
( ~ spl4_1
| ~ spl4_3 ),
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f25]) ).
fof(f25,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl4_1
| ~ spl4_3 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f23,f14]) ).
fof(f23,plain,
( a(sK2,sK3)
| ~ spl4_3 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f21]) ).
fof(f21,plain,
( spl4_3
<=> a(sK2,sK3) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_3])]) ).
fof(f24,plain,
( spl4_2
| spl4_3 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f10,f21,f17]) ).
fof(f10,plain,
( a(sK2,sK3)
| a(sK0,sK1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).
fof(f9,plain,
( ( ! [X0,X1] : ~ a(X0,X1)
| ! [X2,X3] : ~ a(X2,X3) )
& ( a(sK0,sK1)
| a(sK2,sK3) ) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f6,f8,f7]) ).
fof(f7,plain,
( ? [X4,X5] : a(X4,X5)
=> a(sK0,sK1) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f8,plain,
( ? [X6,X7] : a(X6,X7)
=> a(sK2,sK3) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f6,plain,
( ( ! [X0,X1] : ~ a(X0,X1)
| ! [X2,X3] : ~ a(X2,X3) )
& ( ? [X4,X5] : a(X4,X5)
| ? [X6,X7] : a(X6,X7) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f5]) ).
fof(f5,plain,
( ( ! [X0,X1] : ~ a(X0,X1)
| ! [X2,X3] : ~ a(X2,X3) )
& ( ? [X0,X1] : a(X0,X1)
| ? [X2,X3] : a(X2,X3) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
fof(f4,plain,
( ? [X2,X3] : a(X2,X3)
<~> ? [X0,X1] : a(X0,X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
fof(f3,plain,
~ ( ? [X0,X1] : a(X0,X1)
<=> ? [X2,X3] : a(X2,X3) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ? [X0,X1] : a(X0,X1)
<=> ? [X0,X1] : a(X0,X1) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f1,conjecture,
( ? [X0,X1] : a(X0,X1)
<=> ? [X0,X1] : a(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
fof(f15,plain,
( spl4_1
| spl4_1 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f11,f13,f13]) ).
fof(f11,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( ~ a(X2,X3)
| ~ a(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.10 % Problem : SYN960+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.11 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 22:29:26 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.42 % (18024)ott+11_1:1_drc=off:nwc=5.0:slsq=on:slsqc=1:spb=goal_then_units:to=lpo:i=467:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/467Mi)
% 0.16/0.42 % (18011)ott+2_1:1_fsr=off:gsp=on:i=50:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/50Mi)
% 0.16/0.42 % (18024)First to succeed.
% 0.16/0.42 % (18011)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.16/0.43 % (18024)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.16/0.43 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.16/0.43 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.43 % (18024)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.43 % (18024)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.16/0.43 % (18024)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.16/0.43 % (18024)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.16/0.43
% 0.16/0.43 % (18024)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.16/0.43 % (18024)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.16/0.43 % (18024)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.16/0.43 % (18024)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.43 % (18024)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.43 % (18000)Success in time 0.102 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------