TSTP Solution File: SYN958+1 by Goeland---1.0.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Goeland---1.0.0
% Problem  : SYN958+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 29 22:25:06 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.34s
% Output   : Proof 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11  % Problem    : SYN958+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon Sep  5 09:39:30 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.12/0.34  [DMT] DMT loaded with preskolemization
% 0.12/0.34  [EQ] equality loaded.
% 0.12/0.34  [0.000057s][1][MAIN] Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.34  Start search
% 0.12/0.34  nb_step : 1 - limit : 3
% 0.12/0.34  Launch Gotab with destructive = true
% 0.12/0.34  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.34  [0] ALPHA_NOT_IMPLY : ~((? [X1_1] :  (a(X1_1)) & ! [X2_2] :  (b(X2_2))) => ? [X3_3] :  ((a(X3_3) & b(X3_3))))
% 0.12/0.34  	-> [1] (? [X1_1] :  (a(X1_1)) & ! [X2_2] :  (b(X2_2))), ~? [X3_3] :  ((a(X3_3) & b(X3_3)))
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  [1] ALPHA_AND : (? [X1_1] :  (a(X1_1)) & ! [X2_2] :  (b(X2_2)))
% 0.12/0.34  	-> [2] ? [X1_1] :  (a(X1_1)), ! [X2_2] :  (b(X2_2))
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  [2] DELTA_EXISTS : ? [X1_1] :  (a(X1_1))
% 0.12/0.34  	-> [3] a(skolem_X11)
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  [3] GAMMA_NOT_EXISTS : ~? [X3_3] :  ((a(X3_3) & b(X3_3)))
% 0.12/0.34  	-> [4] ~(a(skolem_X11) & b(skolem_X11))
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  [4] BETA_NOT_AND : ~(a(skolem_X11) & b(skolem_X11))
% 0.12/0.34  	-> [5] ~a(skolem_X11)
% 0.12/0.34  	-> [6] ~b(skolem_X11)
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  [5] CLOSURE : ~a(skolem_X11)
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  [6] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [X2_2] :  (b(X2_2))
% 0.12/0.34  	-> [7] b(X2_0_1)
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  [7] CLOSURE : b(X2_0_1)
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.34  [0.004207s][1][Res] 3 goroutines created
% 0.12/0.34  ==== Result ====
% 0.12/0.34  [0.004239s][1][Res] VALID
% 0.12/0.34  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------