TSTP Solution File: SYN957+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : SYN957+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 19:46:12 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.49s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 2 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 28 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 34 ( 16 ~; 10 |; 4 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 9 !; 5 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f12,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f9,f8]) ).
fof(f8,plain,
! [X1] :
( ~ a(X1,X1)
| ~ a(X1,sK0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
fof(f6,plain,
! [X1] :
( ( ~ a(X1,X1)
| ~ a(X1,sK0) )
& ( a(X1,sK0)
| a(X1,X1) ) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f4,f5]) ).
fof(f5,plain,
( ? [X0] :
! [X1] :
( ( ~ a(X1,X1)
| ~ a(X1,X0) )
& ( a(X1,X0)
| a(X1,X1) ) )
=> ! [X1] :
( ( ~ a(X1,X1)
| ~ a(X1,sK0) )
& ( a(X1,sK0)
| a(X1,X1) ) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f4,plain,
? [X0] :
! [X1] :
( ( ~ a(X1,X1)
| ~ a(X1,X0) )
& ( a(X1,X0)
| a(X1,X1) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
fof(f3,plain,
? [X0] :
! [X1] :
( ~ a(X1,X1)
<=> a(X1,X0) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f2]) ).
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ ? [X0] :
! [X1] :
( ~ a(X1,X1)
<=> a(X1,X0) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f1,conjecture,
~ ? [X0] :
! [X1] :
( ~ a(X1,X1)
<=> a(X1,X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
fof(f9,plain,
a(sK0,sK0),
inference(factoring,[],[f7]) ).
fof(f7,plain,
! [X1] :
( a(X1,sK0)
| a(X1,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SYN957+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 22:29:19 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.49 % (7985)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=498:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/498Mi)
% 0.19/0.49 % (7977)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/68Mi)
% 0.19/0.49 % (7985)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.49 % (7985)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.49 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.49 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.49 % (7985)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 % (7985)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.49 % (7985)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.49 % (7985)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 % (7985)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.19/0.49 % (7985)Time elapsed: 0.057 s
% 0.19/0.49 % (7985)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.19/0.49 % (7985)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 % (7985)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 % (7961)Success in time 0.148 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------