TSTP Solution File: SYN956+1 by Goeland---1.0.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Goeland---1.0.0
% Problem : SYN956+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 29 22:25:06 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.35s
% Output : Proof 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SYN956+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Sep 5 09:54:03 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 [DMT] DMT loaded with preskolemization
% 0.13/0.34 [EQ] equality loaded.
% 0.13/0.34 [0.000039s][1][MAIN] Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.34 Start search
% 0.13/0.34 nb_step : 1 - limit : 3
% 0.13/0.34 Launch Gotab with destructive = true
% 0.13/0.35 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35 [0] ALPHA_NOT_IMPLY : ~(? [X1_1] : ((a(X1_1) => b(X1_1))) => (! [X2_2] : (a(X2_2)) => ? [X3_3] : (b(X3_3))))
% 0.13/0.35 -> [1] ? [X1_1] : ((a(X1_1) => b(X1_1))), ~(! [X2_2] : (a(X2_2)) => ? [X3_3] : (b(X3_3)))
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 [1] ALPHA_NOT_IMPLY : ~(! [X2_2] : (a(X2_2)) => ? [X3_3] : (b(X3_3)))
% 0.13/0.35 -> [2] ! [X2_2] : (a(X2_2)), ~? [X3_3] : (b(X3_3))
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 [2] DELTA_EXISTS : ? [X1_1] : ((a(X1_1) => b(X1_1)))
% 0.13/0.35 -> [3] (a(skolem_X11) => b(skolem_X11))
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 [3] BETA_IMPLY : (a(skolem_X11) => b(skolem_X11))
% 0.13/0.35 -> [4] ~a(skolem_X11)
% 0.13/0.35 -> [5] b(skolem_X11)
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 [4] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [X2_2] : (a(X2_2))
% 0.13/0.35 -> [7] a(X2_1_0)
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 [7] CLOSURE : a(X2_1_0)
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 [5] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [X2_2] : (a(X2_2))
% 0.13/0.35 -> [6] a(X2_0_0)
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 [6] GAMMA_NOT_EXISTS : ~? [X3_3] : (b(X3_3))
% 0.13/0.35 -> [8] ~b(X3_0_1)
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 [8] CLOSURE : ~b(X3_0_1)
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35 [0.005119s][1][Res] 9 goroutines created
% 0.13/0.35 ==== Result ====
% 0.13/0.35 [0.005152s][1][Res] VALID
% 0.13/0.35 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------