TSTP Solution File: SYN953+1 by Z3---4.8.9.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Z3---4.8.9.0
% Problem  : SYN953+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 30 00:01:23 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.39s
% Output   : Proof 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SYN953+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Sep  5 09:25:36 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.35  Z3tptp [4.8.9.0] (c) 2006-20**. Microsoft Corp.
% 0.20/0.35  Usage: tptp [options] [-file:]file
% 0.20/0.35    -h, -?       prints this message.
% 0.20/0.35    -smt2        print SMT-LIB2 benchmark.
% 0.20/0.35    -m, -model   generate model.
% 0.20/0.35    -p, -proof   generate proof.
% 0.20/0.35    -c, -core    generate unsat core of named formulas.
% 0.20/0.35    -st, -statistics display statistics.
% 0.20/0.35    -t:timeout   set timeout (in second).
% 0.20/0.35    -smt2status  display status in smt2 format instead of SZS.
% 0.20/0.35    -check_status check the status produced by Z3 against annotation in benchmark.
% 0.20/0.35    -<param>:<value> configuration parameter and value.
% 0.20/0.35    -o:<output-file> file to place output in.
% 0.20/0.39  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.39  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.39  tff(p_type, type, (
% 0.20/0.39     p: $i > $o)).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(tptp_fun_X_0_type, type, (
% 0.20/0.39     tptp_fun_X_0: $i)).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(q_type, type, (
% 0.20/0.39     q: $i > $o)).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(1,plain,
% 0.20/0.39      (^[X: $i] : refl((q(X) | (~p(X))) <=> (q(X) | (~p(X))))),
% 0.20/0.39      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(2,plain,
% 0.20/0.39      (![X: $i] : (q(X) | (~p(X))) <=> ![X: $i] : (q(X) | (~p(X)))),
% 0.20/0.39      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[1])).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(3,plain,
% 0.20/0.39      (![X: $i] : (q(X) | (~p(X))) <=> ![X: $i] : (q(X) | (~p(X)))),
% 0.20/0.39      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(4,plain,
% 0.20/0.39      ((~(![X: $i] : (p(X) => q(X)) => (![X: $i] : p(X) => ![X: $i] : q(X)))) <=> (~(![X: $i] : q(X) | (~![X: $i] : p(X)) | (~![X: $i] : (q(X) | (~p(X))))))),
% 0.20/0.39      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(5,axiom,(~(![X: $i] : (p(X) => q(X)) => (![X: $i] : p(X) => ![X: $i] : q(X)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','prove_this')).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(6,plain,
% 0.20/0.39      (~(![X: $i] : q(X) | (~![X: $i] : p(X)) | (~![X: $i] : (q(X) | (~p(X)))))),
% 0.20/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[5, 4])).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(7,plain,
% 0.20/0.39      (![X: $i] : (q(X) | (~p(X)))),
% 0.20/0.39      inference(or_elim,[status(thm)],[6])).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(8,plain,
% 0.20/0.39      (![X: $i] : (q(X) | (~p(X)))),
% 0.20/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[7, 3])).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(9,plain,(
% 0.20/0.39      ![X: $i] : (q(X) | (~p(X)))),
% 0.20/0.39      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[8])).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(10,plain,
% 0.20/0.39      (![X: $i] : (q(X) | (~p(X)))),
% 0.20/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[9, 2])).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(11,plain,
% 0.20/0.39      ((~![X: $i] : q(X)) <=> (~![X: $i] : q(X))),
% 0.20/0.39      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(12,plain,
% 0.20/0.39      (~![X: $i] : q(X)),
% 0.20/0.39      inference(or_elim,[status(thm)],[6])).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(13,plain,
% 0.20/0.39      (~![X: $i] : q(X)),
% 0.20/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[12, 11])).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(14,plain,
% 0.20/0.39      (~![X: $i] : q(X)),
% 0.20/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[13, 11])).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(15,plain,
% 0.20/0.39      (~![X: $i] : q(X)),
% 0.20/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[14, 11])).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(16,plain,
% 0.20/0.39      (~![X: $i] : q(X)),
% 0.20/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[15, 11])).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(17,plain,
% 0.20/0.39      (~![X: $i] : q(X)),
% 0.20/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[16, 11])).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(18,plain,
% 0.20/0.39      (~![X: $i] : q(X)),
% 0.20/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[17, 11])).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(19,plain,(
% 0.20/0.39      ~q(X!0)),
% 0.20/0.39      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[18])).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(20,plain,
% 0.20/0.39      (((~![X: $i] : (q(X) | (~p(X)))) | (q(X!0) | (~p(X!0)))) <=> ((~![X: $i] : (q(X) | (~p(X)))) | q(X!0) | (~p(X!0)))),
% 0.20/0.39      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(21,plain,
% 0.20/0.39      ((~![X: $i] : (q(X) | (~p(X)))) | (q(X!0) | (~p(X!0)))),
% 0.20/0.39      inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(22,plain,
% 0.20/0.39      ((~![X: $i] : (q(X) | (~p(X)))) | q(X!0) | (~p(X!0))),
% 0.20/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[21, 20])).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(23,plain,
% 0.20/0.39      (~p(X!0)),
% 0.20/0.39      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[22, 19, 10])).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(24,plain,
% 0.20/0.39      (^[X: $i] : refl(p(X) <=> p(X))),
% 0.20/0.39      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(25,plain,
% 0.20/0.39      (![X: $i] : p(X) <=> ![X: $i] : p(X)),
% 0.20/0.39      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[24])).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(26,plain,
% 0.20/0.39      (![X: $i] : p(X) <=> ![X: $i] : p(X)),
% 0.20/0.39      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(27,plain,
% 0.20/0.39      (![X: $i] : p(X)),
% 0.20/0.39      inference(or_elim,[status(thm)],[6])).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(28,plain,
% 0.20/0.39      (![X: $i] : p(X)),
% 0.20/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[27, 26])).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(29,plain,(
% 0.20/0.39      ![X: $i] : p(X)),
% 0.20/0.39      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[28])).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(30,plain,
% 0.20/0.39      (![X: $i] : p(X)),
% 0.20/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[29, 25])).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(31,plain,
% 0.20/0.39      ((~![X: $i] : p(X)) | p(X!0)),
% 0.20/0.39      inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.20/0.39  tff(32,plain,
% 0.20/0.39      ($false),
% 0.20/0.39      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[31, 30, 23])).
% 0.20/0.39  % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------