TSTP Solution File: SYN949+1 by SuperZenon---0.0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem  : SYN949+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:47:27 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.41s
% Output   : Proof 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : SYN949+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 04:32:29 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.41  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.41  (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 0.20/0.41  (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 0.20/0.41  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.41  1. (s T_0) (-. (s T_0))   ### Axiom
% 0.20/0.41  2. (-. (p T_0)) (p T_0)   ### Axiom
% 0.20/0.41  3. ((s T_0) => (p T_0)) (-. (p T_0)) (s T_0)   ### Imply 1 2
% 0.20/0.41  4. (All X, ((s X) => (p X))) (s T_0) (-. (p T_0))   ### All 3
% 0.20/0.41  5. (r T_0 T_1) (-. (r T_0 T_1))   ### Axiom
% 0.20/0.41  6. (-. (q T_0 T_1)) (q T_0 T_1)   ### Axiom
% 0.20/0.41  7. ((r T_0 T_1) => (q T_0 T_1)) (-. (q T_0 T_1)) (r T_0 T_1)   ### Imply 5 6
% 0.20/0.41  8. (All Y, ((r T_0 Y) => (q T_0 Y))) (r T_0 T_1) (-. (q T_0 T_1))   ### All 7
% 0.20/0.41  9. (All X, (All Y, ((r X Y) => (q X Y)))) (-. (q T_0 T_1)) (r T_0 T_1)   ### All 8
% 0.20/0.41  10. (-. ((p T_0) /\ (q T_0 T_1))) (r T_0 T_1) (All X, (All Y, ((r X Y) => (q X Y)))) (s T_0) (All X, ((s X) => (p X)))   ### NotAnd 4 9
% 0.20/0.41  11. (-. (Ex Y, ((p T_0) /\ (q T_0 Y)))) (All X, ((s X) => (p X))) (s T_0) (All X, (All Y, ((r X Y) => (q X Y)))) (r T_0 T_1)   ### NotExists 10
% 0.20/0.41  12. (-. (Ex X, (Ex Y, ((p X) /\ (q X Y))))) (r T_0 T_1) (All X, (All Y, ((r X Y) => (q X Y)))) (s T_0) (All X, ((s X) => (p X)))   ### NotExists 11
% 0.20/0.41  13. (-. (((s T_2) /\ ((s T_0) /\ ((r T_0 T_1) /\ ((All X, ((s X) => (p X))) /\ (All X, (All Y, ((r X Y) => (q X Y)))))))) => (Ex X, (Ex Y, ((p X) /\ (q X Y))))))   ### ConjTree 12
% 0.20/0.41  14. (-. (All C, (((s T_2) /\ ((s T_0) /\ ((r T_0 C) /\ ((All X, ((s X) => (p X))) /\ (All X, (All Y, ((r X Y) => (q X Y)))))))) => (Ex X, (Ex Y, ((p X) /\ (q X Y)))))))   ### NotAllEx 13
% 0.20/0.41  15. (-. (All B, (All C, (((s T_2) /\ ((s B) /\ ((r B C) /\ ((All X, ((s X) => (p X))) /\ (All X, (All Y, ((r X Y) => (q X Y)))))))) => (Ex X, (Ex Y, ((p X) /\ (q X Y))))))))   ### NotAllEx 14
% 0.20/0.41  16. (-. (All A, (All B, (All C, (((s A) /\ ((s B) /\ ((r B C) /\ ((All X, ((s X) => (p X))) /\ (All X, (All Y, ((r X Y) => (q X Y)))))))) => (Ex X, (Ex Y, ((p X) /\ (q X Y)))))))))   ### NotAllEx 15
% 0.20/0.41  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.41  (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------