TSTP Solution File: SYN948+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : SYN948+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 19:46:10 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 0.51s
% Output : Refutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 22 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 18 ( 5 ~; 0 |; 10 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 con; 1-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 11 !; 7 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f10,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f7,f9]) ).
fof(f9,plain,
! [X0] : ~ a(X0,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
fof(f6,plain,
( ! [X0] : ~ a(X0,X0)
& ! [X1] :
( a(X1,sK0(X1))
& a(sK0(X1),sK0(X1)) ) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f4,f5]) ).
fof(f5,plain,
! [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( a(X1,X2)
& a(X2,X2) )
=> ( a(X1,sK0(X1))
& a(sK0(X1),sK0(X1)) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f4,plain,
( ! [X0] : ~ a(X0,X0)
& ! [X1] :
? [X2] :
( a(X1,X2)
& a(X2,X2) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).
fof(f3,plain,
( ! [X2] : ~ a(X2,X2)
& ! [X0] :
? [X1] :
( a(X0,X1)
& a(X1,X1) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ! [X0] :
? [X1] :
( a(X0,X1)
& a(X1,X1) )
=> ? [X2] : a(X2,X2) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f1,conjecture,
( ! [X0] :
? [X1] :
( a(X0,X1)
& a(X1,X1) )
=> ? [X2] : a(X2,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
fof(f7,plain,
! [X1] : a(sK0(X1),sK0(X1)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : SYN948+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.08/0.15 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 22:32:52 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.50 % (16592)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=177:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/177Mi)
% 0.23/0.51 % (16585)ott+10_1:8_bsd=on:fsd=on:lcm=predicate:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2at=1.5:spb=goal_then_units:i=176:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/176Mi)
% 0.23/0.51 % (16577)ott+10_1:28_bd=off:bs=on:tgt=ground:i=101:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/101Mi)
% 0.23/0.51 % (16577)First to succeed.
% 0.23/0.51 % (16577)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.23/0.51 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.23/0.51 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.51 % (16577)------------------------------
% 0.23/0.51 % (16577)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.23/0.51 % (16577)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.23/0.51 % (16577)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.23/0.51
% 0.23/0.51 % (16577)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.23/0.51 % (16577)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.23/0.51 % (16577)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.23/0.51 % (16577)------------------------------
% 0.23/0.51 % (16577)------------------------------
% 0.23/0.51 % (16564)Success in time 0.133 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------