TSTP Solution File: SYN946+1 by Goeland---1.0.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Goeland---1.0.0
% Problem  : SYN946+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 29 22:25:03 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.34s
% Output   : Proof 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11  % Problem    : SYN946+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon Sep  5 09:56:33 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.12/0.34  [DMT] DMT loaded with preskolemization
% 0.12/0.34  [EQ] equality loaded.
% 0.12/0.34  [0.000037s][1][MAIN] Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.34  Start search
% 0.12/0.34  nb_step : 1 - limit : 4
% 0.12/0.34  Launch Gotab with destructive = true
% 0.12/0.34  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.34  [0] ALPHA_NOT_IMPLY : ~((! [X3_3] :  (p(X3_3)) & ? [Y4_4] :  (q(Y4_4))) => ? [Z5_5] :  (! [Y6_6] :  ((p(Y6_6) | r(Z5_5)))))
% 0.12/0.34  	-> [1] (! [X3_3] :  (p(X3_3)) & ? [Y4_4] :  (q(Y4_4))), ~? [Z5_5] :  (! [Y6_6] :  ((p(Y6_6) | r(Z5_5))))
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  [1] ALPHA_AND : (! [X3_3] :  (p(X3_3)) & ? [Y4_4] :  (q(Y4_4)))
% 0.12/0.34  	-> [2] ! [X3_3] :  (p(X3_3)), ? [Y4_4] :  (q(Y4_4))
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  [2] DELTA_EXISTS : ? [Y4_4] :  (q(Y4_4))
% 0.12/0.34  	-> [3] q(skolem_Y44)
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  [3] GAMMA_NOT_EXISTS : ~? [Z5_5] :  (! [Y6_6] :  ((p(Y6_6) | r(Z5_5))))
% 0.12/0.34  	-> [4] ~! [Y6_6] :  ((p(Y6_6) | r(Z5_0_0)))
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  [4] DELTA_NOT_FORALL : ~! [Y6_6] :  ((p(Y6_6) | r(Z5_0_0)))
% 0.12/0.34  	-> [5] ~(p(skolem_Y66(Z5_0_0)) | r(Z5_0_0))
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  [5] ALPHA_NOT_OR : ~(p(skolem_Y66(Z5_0_0)) | r(Z5_0_0))
% 0.12/0.34  	-> [6] ~p(skolem_Y66(Z5_0_0)), ~r(Z5_0_0)
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  [6] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [X3_3] :  (p(X3_3))
% 0.12/0.34  	-> [7] p(X3_0_1)
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  [7] CLOSURE : p(X3_0_1)
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.34  [0.004933s][1][Res] 3 goroutines created
% 0.12/0.34  ==== Result ====
% 0.12/0.34  [0.004965s][1][Res] VALID
% 0.12/0.34  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------