TSTP Solution File: SYN946+1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SYN946+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 06:15:00 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.36s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 6 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 13 ( 4 ~; 2 |; 5 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 1 sgn 6 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_this,conjecture,
( ( ! [X1] : p(X1)
& ? [X2] : q(X2) )
=> ? [X3] :
! [X2] :
( p(X2)
| r(X3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( ! [X1] : p(X1)
& ? [X2] : q(X2) )
=> ? [X3] :
! [X2] :
( p(X2)
| r(X3) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_this]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X4,X7] :
( p(X4)
& q(esk1_0)
& ~ p(esk2_0)
& ~ r(X7) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ p(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
p(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SYN946+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 20:12:23 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_C48_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.12/0.36 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 0.12/0.36 #
% 0.12/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 # Proof found!
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.36 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------