TSTP Solution File: SYN944+1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SYN944+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qmAHagxVSw true
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 04:06:19 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.74s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 6 unt; 6 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 30 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 68 ( 7 ~; 3 |; 10 &; 42 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 6 ( 6 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 7 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 0 ^; 17 !; 4 ?; 21 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(s_type,type,
s: $i > $o ).
thf(sk__2_type,type,
sk__2: $i ).
thf(q_type,type,
q: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(p_type,type,
p: $i > $o ).
thf(r_type,type,
r: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(sk__1_type,type,
sk__1: $i ).
thf(prove_this,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( s @ A )
& ( s @ B )
& ( r @ B @ C )
& ! [X: $i] :
( ( s @ X )
=> ( p @ X ) )
& ! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
( ( r @ X @ Y )
=> ( q @ X @ Y ) ) )
=> ? [X: $i,Y: $i] :
( ( q @ X @ Y )
& ( p @ X ) ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( s @ A )
& ( s @ B )
& ( r @ B @ C )
& ! [X: $i] :
( ( s @ X )
=> ( p @ X ) )
& ! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
( ( r @ X @ Y )
=> ( q @ X @ Y ) ) )
=> ? [X: $i,Y: $i] :
( ( q @ X @ Y )
& ( p @ X ) ) ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[prove_this]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl2,plain,
s @ sk__1,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl3,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( p @ X0 )
| ~ ( s @ X0 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl0,plain,
r @ sk__1 @ sk__2,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl4,plain,
! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( q @ X1 @ X2 )
| ~ ( r @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl6,plain,
q @ sk__1 @ sk__2,
inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl0,zip_derived_cl4]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl5,plain,
! [X3: $i,X4: $i] :
( ~ ( p @ X3 )
| ~ ( q @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl7,plain,
~ ( p @ sk__1 ),
inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl6,zip_derived_cl5]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl8,plain,
~ ( s @ sk__1 ),
inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl3,zip_derived_cl7]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl9,plain,
$false,
inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl2,zip_derived_cl8]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN944+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qmAHagxVSw true
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 22:01:38 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.34 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.34 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.34 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.34 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.20/0.66 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.20/0.66 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.20/0.66 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.20/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.20/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.20/0.74 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.20/0.74 % BCE start: 6
% 0.20/0.74 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.20/0.74 % PE start: 6
% 0.20/0.74 logic: neq
% 0.20/0.74 % PE eliminated: 5
% 0.20/0.74 % done 0 iterations in 0.006s
% 0.20/0.74 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.20/0.74 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.74
% 0.20/0.74
% 0.20/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.20/0.75 % Terminating...
% 1.38/0.85 % Runner terminated.
% 1.38/0.86 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------