%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SYN944+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:32:14 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.42s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    8 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   11 (   0 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    s(skc3),
    file('SYN944+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    r(skc3,skc4),
    file('SYN944+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ( ~ s(u)
    | p(u) ),
    file('SYN944+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ p(u)
    | ~ q(u,v) ),
    file('SYN944+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( ~ r(u,v)
    | q(u,v) ),
    file('SYN944+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,plain,
    q(skc3,skc4),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3,6]),
    [iquote('0:Res:3.0,6.0')] ).

cnf(11,plain,
    ~ p(skc3),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[10,5]),
    [iquote('0:Res:10.0,5.1')] ).

cnf(12,plain,
    $false,
    inference(ssi,[status(thm)],[11,4,1]),
    [iquote('0:SSi:11.0,4.0,1.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SYN944+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 08:44:05 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.42  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.42  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.42  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.42  SPASS derived 2 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 8 clauses.
% 0.19/0.42  SPASS allocated 97559 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.42  SPASS spent	0:00:00.08 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.42  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.42  		0:00:00.02 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.42  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.42  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.42  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 8 :
% 0.19/0.42  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.42  Formulae used in the proof : prove_this
% 0.19/0.42  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------