TSTP Solution File: SYN944+1 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : SYN944+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:16:57 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 2.46s 1.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 6 unt; 7 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 21 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 17 ( 6 ~; 3 |; 5 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 6 ( 4 >; 2 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 (; 11 !; 2 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ r > q > s > p > #nlpp > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_1
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(q,type,
q: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(p,type,
p: $i > $o ).
tff('#skF_2',type,
'#skF_2': $i ).
tff('#skF_3',type,
'#skF_3': $i ).
tff('#skF_1',type,
'#skF_1': $i ).
tff(s,type,
s: $i > $o ).
tff(r,type,
r: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(f_46,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A,B,C] :
( ( s(A)
& s(B)
& r(B,C)
& ! [X] :
( s(X)
=> p(X) )
& ! [X,Y] :
( r(X,Y)
=> q(X,Y) ) )
=> ? [X,Y] :
( p(X)
& q(X,Y) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
tff(c_10,plain,
s('#skF_2'),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_46]) ).
tff(c_13,plain,
! [X_11] :
( p(X_11)
| ~ s(X_11) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_46]) ).
tff(c_20,plain,
p('#skF_2'),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_13]) ).
tff(c_8,plain,
r('#skF_2','#skF_3'),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_46]) ).
tff(c_23,plain,
! [X_14,Y_15] :
( q(X_14,Y_15)
| ~ r(X_14,Y_15) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_46]) ).
tff(c_27,plain,
q('#skF_2','#skF_3'),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_23]) ).
tff(c_2,plain,
! [X_9,Y_10] :
( ~ q(X_9,Y_10)
| ~ p(X_9) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_46]) ).
tff(c_30,plain,
~ p('#skF_2'),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_27,c_2]) ).
tff(c_34,plain,
$false,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_20,c_30]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SYN944+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 17:33:30 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 2.46/1.59 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.46/1.59
% 2.46/1.59 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.46/1.62
% 2.46/1.62 Inference rules
% 2.46/1.62 ----------------------
% 2.46/1.62 #Ref : 0
% 2.46/1.62 #Sup : 4
% 2.46/1.62 #Fact : 0
% 2.46/1.62 #Define : 0
% 2.46/1.62 #Split : 0
% 2.46/1.62 #Chain : 0
% 2.46/1.62 #Close : 0
% 2.46/1.62
% 2.46/1.62 Ordering : KBO
% 2.46/1.62
% 2.46/1.62 Simplification rules
% 2.46/1.62 ----------------------
% 2.46/1.62 #Subsume : 0
% 2.46/1.62 #Demod : 1
% 2.46/1.62 #Tautology : 0
% 2.46/1.62 #SimpNegUnit : 0
% 2.46/1.62 #BackRed : 0
% 2.46/1.62
% 2.46/1.62 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.46/1.62 #Strategies tried : 1
% 2.46/1.62
% 2.46/1.62 Timing (in seconds)
% 2.46/1.62 ----------------------
% 2.46/1.62 Preprocessing : 0.40
% 2.46/1.62 Parsing : 0.22
% 2.46/1.62 CNF conversion : 0.02
% 2.46/1.62 Main loop : 0.16
% 2.46/1.62 Inferencing : 0.08
% 2.46/1.62 Reduction : 0.03
% 2.46/1.62 Demodulation : 0.02
% 2.46/1.62 BG Simplification : 0.01
% 2.46/1.62 Subsumption : 0.03
% 2.46/1.63 Abstraction : 0.00
% 2.46/1.63 MUC search : 0.00
% 2.46/1.63 Cooper : 0.00
% 2.46/1.63 Total : 0.60
% 2.46/1.63 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 2.46/1.63 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 2.46/1.63 Index Matching : 0.00
% 2.46/1.63 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------