%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem  : SYN940+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : nanocop.sh %s %d

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 12:34:44 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.24s 1.37s
% Output   : Proof 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SYN940+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu May 18 19:52:18 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.24/1.37  
% 0.24/1.37  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p is a Theorem
% 0.24/1.37  Start of proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/1.37  %-----------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.37  ncf(matrix, plain, [(4 ^ _6805) ^ [_6869] : [-(q(f(_6869)))], (6 ^ _6805) ^ [_6957, _6959] : [q(_6959), 7 ^ _6805 : [(8 ^ _6805) ^ [] : [-(p(f(_6957)))], (10 ^ _6805) ^ [] : [p(_6959), 13 ^ _6805 : [(14 ^ _6805) ^ [] : [-(r(_6957))], (16 ^ _6805) ^ [] : [r(1 ^ []), r(2 ^ [])]]]]]], input).
% 0.24/1.37  ncf('1',plain,[q(f(1 ^ [])), 10 : p(f(1 ^ [])), 16 : r(1 ^ []), 16 : r(2 ^ [])],start(6 ^ 0,bind([[_6957, _6959], [1 ^ [], f(1 ^ [])]]))).
% 0.24/1.37  ncf('1.1',plain,[-(q(f(1 ^ [])))],extension(4 ^ 1,bind([[_6869], [1 ^ []]]))).
% 0.24/1.37  ncf('1.2',plain,[-(p(f(1 ^ [])))],extension(8 ^ 3)).
% 0.24/1.37  ncf('1.3',plain,[-(r(1 ^ []))],extension(14 ^ 5)).
% 0.24/1.37  ncf('1.4',plain,[-(r(2 ^ [])), 10 : p(f(2 ^ [])), 10 : q(f(2 ^ []))],extension(6 ^ 5,bind([[_6957, _6959], [2 ^ [], f(2 ^ [])]]))).
% 0.24/1.37  ncf('1.4.1',plain,[-(p(f(2 ^ [])))],extension(8 ^ 8)).
% 0.24/1.37  ncf('1.4.2',plain,[-(q(f(2 ^ [])))],extension(4 ^ 6,bind([[_6869], [2 ^ []]]))).
% 0.24/1.37  %-----------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.37  End of proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------