TSTP Solution File: SYN940+1 by SuperZenon---0.0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem  : SYN940+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:47:24 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.41s
% Output   : Proof 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SYN940+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 06:23:54 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.41  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.41  (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 0.18/0.41  (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 0.18/0.41  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.18/0.41  1. (-. (p (f zenon_X0))) (p (f zenon_X0))   ### Axiom
% 0.18/0.41  2. (-. ((p (f zenon_X0)) => ((p (f zenon_X0)) /\ ((r zenon_X0) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2)))))) (-. (p (f zenon_X0)))   ### NotImply 1
% 0.18/0.41  3. (q (f zenon_X0)) (-. (q (f zenon_X0)))   ### Axiom
% 0.18/0.41  4. (-. (((p (f zenon_X0)) => ((p (f zenon_X0)) /\ ((r zenon_X0) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q (f zenon_X0)))) (q (f zenon_X0)) (-. (p (f zenon_X0)))   ### NotAnd 2 3
% 0.18/0.41  5. (-. (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p (f zenon_X0)) /\ ((r Y) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q (f zenon_X0))))) (-. (p (f zenon_X0))) (q (f zenon_X0))   ### NotExists 4
% 0.18/0.41  6. (p (f T_1)) (-. (p (f T_1)))   ### Axiom
% 0.18/0.41  7. (-. (r T_1)) (r T_1)   ### Axiom
% 0.18/0.41  8. (-. ((r T_1) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2)))) (-. (r T_1))   ### NotImply 7
% 0.18/0.41  9. (-. ((p (f T_1)) /\ ((r T_1) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) (-. (r T_1)) (p (f T_1))   ### NotAnd 6 8
% 0.18/0.41  10. (-. ((p (f T_1)) => ((p (f T_1)) /\ ((r T_1) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2)))))) (p (f T_1)) (-. (r T_1))   ### NotImply 9
% 0.18/0.41  11. (q (f T_1)) (-. (q (f T_1)))   ### Axiom
% 0.18/0.41  12. (-. (((p (f T_1)) => ((p (f T_1)) /\ ((r T_1) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q (f T_1)))) (q (f T_1)) (-. (r T_1)) (p (f T_1))   ### NotAnd 10 11
% 0.18/0.41  13. (-. (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p (f T_1)) /\ ((r Y) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q (f T_1))))) (p (f T_1)) (-. (r T_1)) (q (f T_1))   ### NotExists 12
% 0.18/0.41  14. (-. (Ex X, (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p X) /\ ((r Y) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q X))))) (q (f T_1)) (-. (r T_1)) (p (f T_1))   ### NotExists 13
% 0.18/0.41  15. (All Z, (q (f Z))) (p (f T_1)) (-. (r T_1)) (-. (Ex X, (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p X) /\ ((r Y) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q X)))))   ### All 14
% 0.18/0.41  16. (-. ((p (f T_1)) => ((p (f zenon_X0)) /\ ((r T_1) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2)))))) (-. (Ex X, (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p X) /\ ((r Y) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q X))))) (-. (r T_1)) (All Z, (q (f Z)))   ### NotImply 15
% 0.18/0.41  17. (q (f zenon_X0)) (-. (q (f zenon_X0)))   ### Axiom
% 0.18/0.41  18. (-. (((p (f T_1)) => ((p (f zenon_X0)) /\ ((r T_1) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q (f zenon_X0)))) (q (f zenon_X0)) (All Z, (q (f Z))) (-. (r T_1)) (-. (Ex X, (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p X) /\ ((r Y) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q X)))))   ### NotAnd 16 17
% 0.18/0.41  19. (-. (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p (f zenon_X0)) /\ ((r Y) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q (f zenon_X0))))) (-. (Ex X, (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p X) /\ ((r Y) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q X))))) (-. (r T_1)) (All Z, (q (f Z))) (q (f zenon_X0))   ### NotExists 18
% 0.18/0.41  20. (p (f T_2)) (-. (p (f T_2)))   ### Axiom
% 0.18/0.41  21. (-. (r T_2)) (r T_2)   ### Axiom
% 0.18/0.41  22. (-. ((r T_2) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2)))) (-. (r T_2))   ### NotImply 21
% 0.18/0.41  23. (-. ((p (f T_2)) /\ ((r T_2) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) (-. (r T_2)) (p (f T_2))   ### NotAnd 20 22
% 0.18/0.41  24. (-. ((p (f T_2)) => ((p (f T_2)) /\ ((r T_2) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2)))))) (p (f T_2)) (-. (r T_2))   ### NotImply 23
% 0.18/0.41  25. (q (f T_2)) (-. (q (f T_2)))   ### Axiom
% 0.18/0.41  26. (-. (((p (f T_2)) => ((p (f T_2)) /\ ((r T_2) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q (f T_2)))) (q (f T_2)) (-. (r T_2)) (p (f T_2))   ### NotAnd 24 25
% 0.18/0.41  27. (-. (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p (f T_2)) /\ ((r Y) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q (f T_2))))) (p (f T_2)) (-. (r T_2)) (q (f T_2))   ### NotExists 26
% 0.18/0.41  28. (-. (Ex X, (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p X) /\ ((r Y) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q X))))) (q (f T_2)) (-. (r T_2)) (p (f T_2))   ### NotExists 27
% 0.18/0.41  29. (All Z, (q (f Z))) (p (f T_2)) (-. (r T_2)) (-. (Ex X, (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p X) /\ ((r Y) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q X)))))   ### All 28
% 0.18/0.41  30. (-. ((p (f T_2)) => ((p (f zenon_X0)) /\ ((r T_2) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2)))))) (-. (Ex X, (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p X) /\ ((r Y) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q X))))) (-. (r T_2)) (All Z, (q (f Z)))   ### NotImply 29
% 0.18/0.41  31. (q (f zenon_X0)) (-. (q (f zenon_X0)))   ### Axiom
% 0.18/0.41  32. (-. (((p (f T_2)) => ((p (f zenon_X0)) /\ ((r T_2) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q (f zenon_X0)))) (q (f zenon_X0)) (All Z, (q (f Z))) (-. (r T_2)) (-. (Ex X, (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p X) /\ ((r Y) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q X)))))   ### NotAnd 30 31
% 0.18/0.41  33. (-. (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p (f zenon_X0)) /\ ((r Y) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q (f zenon_X0))))) (-. (Ex X, (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p X) /\ ((r Y) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q X))))) (-. (r T_2)) (All Z, (q (f Z))) (q (f zenon_X0))   ### NotExists 32
% 0.18/0.41  34. (-. ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))) (q (f zenon_X0)) (All Z, (q (f Z))) (-. (Ex X, (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p X) /\ ((r Y) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q X))))) (-. (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p (f zenon_X0)) /\ ((r Y) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q (f zenon_X0)))))   ### NotAnd 19 33
% 0.18/0.41  35. (-. ((r zenon_X3) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2)))) (-. (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p (f zenon_X0)) /\ ((r Y) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q (f zenon_X0))))) (-. (Ex X, (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p X) /\ ((r Y) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q X))))) (All Z, (q (f Z))) (q (f zenon_X0))   ### NotImply 34
% 0.18/0.41  36. (-. ((p (f zenon_X0)) /\ ((r zenon_X3) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) (All Z, (q (f Z))) (-. (Ex X, (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p X) /\ ((r Y) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q X))))) (q (f zenon_X0)) (-. (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p (f zenon_X0)) /\ ((r Y) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q (f zenon_X0)))))   ### NotAnd 5 35
% 0.18/0.41  37. (-. ((p (f zenon_X3)) => ((p (f zenon_X0)) /\ ((r zenon_X3) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2)))))) (-. (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p (f zenon_X0)) /\ ((r Y) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q (f zenon_X0))))) (q (f zenon_X0)) (-. (Ex X, (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p X) /\ ((r Y) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q X))))) (All Z, (q (f Z)))   ### NotImply 36
% 0.18/0.41  38. (q (f zenon_X0)) (-. (q (f zenon_X0)))   ### Axiom
% 0.18/0.41  39. (-. (((p (f zenon_X3)) => ((p (f zenon_X0)) /\ ((r zenon_X3) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q (f zenon_X0)))) (All Z, (q (f Z))) (-. (Ex X, (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p X) /\ ((r Y) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q X))))) (q (f zenon_X0)) (-. (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p (f zenon_X0)) /\ ((r Y) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q (f zenon_X0)))))   ### NotAnd 37 38
% 0.18/0.41  40. (-. (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p (f zenon_X0)) /\ ((r Y) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q (f zenon_X0))))) (q (f zenon_X0)) (-. (Ex X, (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p X) /\ ((r Y) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q X))))) (All Z, (q (f Z)))   ### NotExists 39
% 0.18/0.41  41. (All Z, (q (f Z))) (-. (Ex X, (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p X) /\ ((r Y) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q X))))) (q (f zenon_X0))   ### NotExists 40
% 0.18/0.41  42. (-. (Ex X, (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p X) /\ ((r Y) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q X))))) (All Z, (q (f Z)))   ### All 41
% 0.18/0.41  43. (-. ((All Z, (q (f Z))) => (Ex X, (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p X) /\ ((r Y) => ((r T_1) /\ (r T_2))))) /\ (q X))))))   ### NotImply 42
% 0.18/0.41  44. (-. (All C, ((All Z, (q (f Z))) => (Ex X, (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p X) /\ ((r Y) => ((r T_1) /\ (r C))))) /\ (q X)))))))   ### NotAllEx 43
% 0.18/0.41  45. (-. (All B, (All C, ((All Z, (q (f Z))) => (Ex X, (Ex Y, (((p (f Y)) => ((p X) /\ ((r Y) => ((r B) /\ (r C))))) /\ (q X))))))))   ### NotAllEx 44
% 0.18/0.41  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.18/0.41  (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------