TSTP Solution File: SYN940+1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SYN940+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:25:31 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.89s 2.06s
% Output   : Refutation 1.89s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    7 (   4 unt;   0 nHn;   2 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   13 (   0 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( p(f(A))
    | ~ q(B) ),
    file('SYN940+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ p(A)
    | r(B)
    | ~ q(A) ),
    file('SYN940+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ p(A)
    | ~ r(dollar_c2)
    | ~ r(dollar_c1)
    | ~ q(A) ),
    file('SYN940+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    q(f(A)),
    file('SYN940+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,plain,
    p(f(A)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[4,1]),
    [iquote('hyper,4,1')] ).

cnf(6,plain,
    r(A),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[5,2,4]),
    [iquote('hyper,5,2,4')] ).

cnf(7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[6,3,5,6,4]),
    [iquote('hyper,6,3,5,6,4')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : SYN940+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 11:20:25 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.89/2.06  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.89/2.06  The process was started by sandbox on n011.cluster.edu,
% 1.89/2.06  Wed Jul 27 11:20:25 2022
% 1.89/2.06  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 14391.
% 1.89/2.06  
% 1.89/2.06  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.89/2.06  set(auto).
% 1.89/2.06     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.89/2.06     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.89/2.06     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.89/2.06     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.89/2.06     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.89/2.06     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.89/2.06     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.89/2.06     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.89/2.06     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.89/2.06     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.89/2.06     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.89/2.06  clear(print_given).
% 1.89/2.06  
% 1.89/2.06  formula_list(usable).
% 1.89/2.06  -(all B C ((all Z q(f(Z)))-> (exists X Y ((p(f(Y))->p(X)& (r(Y)->r(B)&r(C)))&q(X))))).
% 1.89/2.06  end_of_list.
% 1.89/2.06  
% 1.89/2.06  -------> usable clausifies to:
% 1.89/2.06  
% 1.89/2.06  list(usable).
% 1.89/2.06  0 [] q(f(Z)).
% 1.89/2.06  0 [] p(f(Y))| -q(X).
% 1.89/2.06  0 [] -p(X)|r(Y)| -q(X).
% 1.89/2.06  0 [] -p(X)| -r($c2)| -r($c1)| -q(X).
% 1.89/2.06  end_of_list.
% 1.89/2.06  
% 1.89/2.06  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 1.89/2.06  
% 1.89/2.06  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 1.89/2.06  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 1.89/2.06  in usable.
% 1.89/2.06  
% 1.89/2.06     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.89/2.06     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 1.89/2.06  
% 1.89/2.06  ------------> process usable:
% 1.89/2.06  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 1 [] p(f(A))| -q(B).
% 1.89/2.06  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 2 [] -p(A)|r(B)| -q(A).
% 1.89/2.06  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 3 [] -p(A)| -r($c2)| -r($c1)| -q(A).
% 1.89/2.06  
% 1.89/2.06  ------------> process sos:
% 1.89/2.06  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 4 [] q(f(A)).
% 1.89/2.06  
% 1.89/2.06  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.89/2.06  
% 1.89/2.06  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.89/2.06  
% 1.89/2.06  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.89/2.06  
% 1.89/2.06  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.00 sec ----> 7 [hyper,6,3,5,6,4] $F.
% 1.89/2.06  
% 1.89/2.06  Length of proof is 2.  Level of proof is 2.
% 1.89/2.06  
% 1.89/2.06  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.89/2.06  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.89/2.06  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.89/2.06  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.89/2.06  
% 1.89/2.06  
% 1.89/2.06  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.89/2.06  
% 1.89/2.06  
% 1.89/2.06  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.89/2.06  
% 1.89/2.06  ============ end of search ============
% 1.89/2.06  
% 1.89/2.06  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.89/2.06  clauses given                  3
% 1.89/2.06  clauses generated              3
% 1.89/2.06  clauses kept                   6
% 1.89/2.06  clauses forward subsumed       0
% 1.89/2.06  clauses back subsumed          2
% 1.89/2.06  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.89/2.06  
% 1.89/2.06  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.89/2.06  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.89/2.06  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.89/2.06  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.89/2.06  
% 1.89/2.06  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.89/2.06  
% 1.89/2.06  Process 14391 finished Wed Jul 27 11:20:27 2022
% 1.89/2.06  Otter interrupted
% 1.89/2.06  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------