%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SYN939+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 04:58:21 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.85s 2.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.85s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   17 (   5 unt;   4 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   41 (   0 equ;  23 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (  16 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( r(X1)
    | p(f(X1))
    | ~ q(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wnpkl79h/input.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(i_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    q(f(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wnpkl79h/input.p',i_0_5) ).

cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ( r(X1)
    | ~ q(X2)
    | ~ p(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wnpkl79h/input.p',i_0_2) ).

cnf(i_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(f(X1))
    | ~ q(X2)
    | ~ r(esk1_0)
    | ~ r(esk2_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wnpkl79h/input.p',i_0_3) ).

cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q(X1)
    | ~ p(X1)
    | ~ r(esk1_0)
    | ~ r(esk2_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wnpkl79h/input.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( r(X1)
    | p(f(X1))
    | ~ q(X2) ),
    i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    q(f(X1)),
    i_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( r(X1)
    | ~ q(X2)
    | ~ p(X2) ),
    i_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(f(X1))
    | r(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( r(X1)
    | r(X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(f(X1))
    | ~ q(X2)
    | ~ r(esk1_0)
    | ~ r(esk2_0) ),
    i_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    r(X1),
    inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q(X1)
    | ~ p(X1)
    | ~ r(esk1_0)
    | ~ r(esk2_0) ),
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(f(X1))
    | ~ q(X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p(X1)
    | ~ q(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_17]),c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    p(f(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_12])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : SYN939+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.04/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 05:57:53 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.85/2.41  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 7.85/2.41  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.85/2.41  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.85/2.41  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_____0003_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y
% 7.85/2.41  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 7.85/2.41  #
% 7.85/2.41  # Preprocessing time       : 0.023 s
% 7.85/2.41  
% 7.85/2.41  # Proof found!
% 7.85/2.41  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.85/2.41  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.85/2.41  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.85/2.41  
% 7.85/2.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.85/2.41  # User time                : 0.021 s
% 7.85/2.41  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 7.85/2.41  # Total time               : 0.029 s
% 7.85/2.41  # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 7.85/2.41  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------