TSTP Solution File: SYN931+1 by Goeland---1.0.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Goeland---1.0.0
% Problem : SYN931+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 29 22:25:00 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.35s
% Output : Proof 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYN931+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Sep 5 09:55:32 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 [DMT] DMT loaded with preskolemization
% 0.13/0.34 [EQ] equality loaded.
% 0.13/0.34 [0.000036s][1][MAIN] Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.34 Start search
% 0.13/0.34 nb_step : 1 - limit : 2
% 0.13/0.34 Launch Gotab with destructive = true
% 0.13/0.35 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35 [0] BETA_NOT_EQUIV : ~(? [X1_1] : ((p(X1_1) & c)) <=> (? [X2_2] : (p(X2_2)) & c))
% 0.13/0.35 -> [1] ~? [X1_1] : ((p(X1_1) & c)), (? [X2_2] : (p(X2_2)) & c)
% 0.13/0.35 -> [2] ? [X1_1] : ((p(X1_1) & c)), ~(? [X2_2] : (p(X2_2)) & c)
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 [2] DELTA_EXISTS : ? [X1_1] : ((p(X1_1) & c))
% 0.13/0.35 -> [3] (p(skolem_X11) & c)
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 [3] ALPHA_AND : (p(skolem_X11) & c)
% 0.13/0.35 -> [5] p(skolem_X11), c
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 [5] BETA_NOT_AND : ~(? [X2_2] : (p(X2_2)) & c)
% 0.13/0.35 -> [7] ~? [X2_2] : (p(X2_2))
% 0.13/0.35 -> [8] ~c
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 [8] CLOSURE : ~c
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 [7] GAMMA_NOT_EXISTS : ~? [X2_2] : (p(X2_2))
% 0.13/0.35 -> [10] ~p(X2_0_0)
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 [10] CLOSURE : ~p(X2_0_0)
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 [1] ALPHA_AND : (? [X2_2] : (p(X2_2)) & c)
% 0.13/0.35 -> [4] ? [X2_2] : (p(X2_2)), c
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 [4] DELTA_EXISTS : ? [X2_2] : (p(X2_2))
% 0.13/0.35 -> [6] p(skolem_X22)
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 [6] GAMMA_NOT_EXISTS : ~? [X1_1] : ((p(X1_1) & c))
% 0.13/0.35 -> [9] ~(p(skolem_X22) & c)
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 [9] BETA_NOT_AND : ~(p(skolem_X22) & c)
% 0.13/0.35 -> [11] ~p(skolem_X22)
% 0.13/0.35 -> [12] ~c
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 [12] CLOSURE : ~c
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 [11] CLOSURE : ~p(skolem_X22)
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35 [0.006403s][1][Res] 25 goroutines created
% 0.13/0.35 ==== Result ====
% 0.13/0.35 [0.006435s][1][Res] VALID
% 0.13/0.35 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------